 | | | >>> chad-kroeger.html <<< Chad Kroeger"Why Don't You And I"
Featuring Carlos Santana
Mysteries of the World (MOTW)Version 0.1 | | | This is a KFCP ... No, not Kentucky Fried Chicken Plate ... KFCP stands for
"keyword-focused content page". This Tier 3 webpage is based on the keyword "chad kroeger". | | The Complete Book of the Unexplained A Thrilling Exploration of the Earth's Most Baffling MysteriesThe Complete Book of the Unexplained is a gripping anthology of the world's most mystifying conundrums. From eerie tales of curses, witchcraft and ghosts, to miraculous accounts of
religious visitations and angels, it covers the complete spectrum of the
unexplained. Combining scientific research, witness accounts and historical evidence, the
authors recount the most bizarre episodes of our planet — and
beyond — in vivid detail. Intriguing secrets of lost civilizations, alien abductions, mystical places,
mythical beasts and stories of life on Mars are revealed, along with tales of
individuals whose remarkable psychic powers have set them apart. Guaranteed to astonish and intrigue, The Complete Book of the Unexplained sheds new light on the deepest, most awesome secrets of the universe.  |  |  |  |
The Weird 100
"TAKE A WALK ON THE WEIRD SIDE"
Sure, everyone's had the occasional odd experience — the car
keys vanishing from your kitchen table, déjà vu , the case of the disappearing beer. Most of them can be explained away. (The dog took your keys; you really have
been here before; your roommate drank the beer.) But what about the true enigmas, the puzzles of science and the universe that
can't be so easily dismissed? Questions such as: - "Who built the baffling monuments on Easter Island?"
- "Did the 'lost' city of Atlantis ever really exist?"
- "What is behind the mysteries of the Bermuda Triangle?"
In this fascinating compendium, Stephen Spignesi presents one hundred of the strangest, most mystifying riddles on earth
including: angels and zombies, near-death experiences, crop circles, poltergeists, auras and halos, Nostradamus's predictions, possession and exorcism, The Philadelphia Experiment, reincarnation and past-life regression, Stonehenge, time travel, legendary beasts and mythological creatures, and more! Filled with dramatic photos and drawings, as well as "pro" and "con" evidence
from believers and skeptics alike, THE WEIRD 100 explores the unbelievable while proving that life is a lot more
interesting — and infinitely weirder — than we
ever imagined. |  |  |  |  |
••••Telling the Truth (About Santa, Etc. ...)Most western parents feel guilty about Santa Claus. When the time comes to face
the question about whether Santa 'really' exists, they feel like slayers of
children's innocence or exploiters of their credulity, or both. In cultures
without Santa, other mythical gift-bearers generate similar family crises.
One mother I know cheerfully admitted that the whole story was hokum and
forfeited her children's trust for the rest of her life. A father of my
acquaintance tried to stress the poetic truth of the tale and faced an
embarrassing interrogation about his hocus-pocus with Santa suits, Christmas
stockings and half-eaten mince pies. Another said, 'It's true about Santa the
way it's true in the book that Long John Silver was a pirate.' 'So it's not
true,' his little boy replied. An academic couple, after discussing it
thoroughly between themselves, decided to tell their children, 'It's true that
Santa brings you your presents in the same way that we speak of the wind
hurrying or the sun smiling.' The little boy and girl, who concluded that the
sun and wind exist and that Santa does not, never forgave them for this evasion.
A schoolmaster who taught my own children and had a very pious little girl
tried saying that the Santa story was a parable: 'You don't suppose,' he said,
'that the things Jesus told in the parables actually happened, do you?' The
child ceased to be pious. Fellow-Catholics gave me rival advice. 'Tell your
boys,' one said, 'that the Santa story is an attempt to express the divine love
that is reflected in parents' love for their children.' I felt this was good
doctrine but that there was no place for Santa in it. 'Of course Santa exists,'
the other asserted. 'He's Saint Nicholas, mediating for children.' I was
prepared to admit this but felt that it tended to make the image of the
gift-bearer pagan and abominable - which, I suppose, it is. I still feel the
Santa tale is more than just another of the falsehoods we invent to manipulate
our victims but I have not yet found the sense in which it is true or a way of
expressing it which exactly fits the
facts.
-- Thomas Dunne, Truth - A History and a Guide for the Perplexed (1997)
|
Tagline: | A rock-style love ballad / love song |
by Paul Quek, from Singapore BBA (Hons), MAppSci (CompSci) [Bachelor of Business Administration, Honours]
[Master of Applied Science, Computing Science] Check this out: Cool Software! (New window opens)
| Incept Date: | | 05 August 2009 | | Rev'd Date: | | 02 April 2010 |
Uploaded to YouTube by: eikorundger2Date of Upload: December 18, 2008 Tags: Santana Chad Kroeger Why Don't You And I |
Uploaded to YouTube by: Elence93Date of Upload: July 25, 2009 Description / Info: "Why Don't You & I" is a 2003 top ten hit by Santana. The song was written by,
and featured Chad Kroeger from Nickelback and was recorded for Carlos Santana's
2002 album Shaman, on the Arista record label.The song was re-recorded in 2003
with vocals by Alex Band of The Calling, as the third single in the United
States. It was released as the second single in Canada in the winter of 2003.
The Chad Kroeger version was also released alongside the Alex Band version in
the United States. Tags: Why don't you and Santana feat.Chad Kroeger lyrics |
Lyrics:
Why Don't You And IBy Chad Kroeger and Santana
Since the moment I spotted you
Like walking around with little wings on my shoes
My stomach's filled with the butterflies
Mmm ... and it's alright
Bouncing round from cloud to cloud
I got the feeling like I'm never gonna come down
If I said I didn't like it then you know I'd lied
Mmm ... every time I try to talk to you
I get tongue-tied
Turns out that everything I say to you
Comes out wrong and never comes out right
CHORUS:
So I'll say why don't you and I get together, and take on the world,
and be together forever
Heads we will and tails we'll try again
So I say why don't you and I hold each other, fly to the moon
and straight on to heaven
Cause without you they're never gonna let me in
When's this fever gonna break?
I think I've handled more than any man can take
I'm like a love-sick puppy chasing you around
Mmm ... and it's alright
Bouncing round from cloud to cloud
I got the feeling like I'm never gonna come down
If I said I didn't like it then you know I'd lied
Mmm ... every time I try to talk to you
I get tongue-tied
Turns out that everything I say to you
Comes out wrong and never comes out right
CHORUS:
So I'll say why don't you and I get together, and take on the world,
and be together forever
Heads we will and tails we'll try again
So I say why don't you and I hold each other, fly to the moon
and straight on to heaven
Cause without you they're never gonna let me in
Slowly I begin to realize, this is never gonna end
But about the same time you walk by
And I say, oh here we go again, oh ...
[Instrumental] Every time I try to talk to you
I get tongue-tied
Turns out that everything I say to you
Comes out wrong and never comes out right
CHORUS:
So I'll say why don't you and I get together, and take on the world,
and be together forever
Heads we will and tails we'll try again
So I say why don't you and I hold each other, fly to the moon
and straight on to heaven
Cause without you they're never gonna let me in
[Instrumental] CHORUS:
So I'll say why don't you and I get together, and take on the world,
and be together forever
Heads we will and tails we'll try again
So I say why don't you and I hold each other, fly to the moon
and straight on to heaven
Cause without you they're never gonna let me in ... (fade)
About Chad Kroeger:
Chad Robert Kroeger (born Chad Robert Turton on November 15, 1974 in Hanna, Alberta) is the lead
vocalist and guitarist for the band Nickelback. In addition to his work with Nickelback, Kroeger has been involved with a
variety of collaborations, co-writing songs for other artists and for films. —
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chad_Kroeger
Hailing from the small farming community of Hanna, Alberta, Canada, Chad Kroeger made a name for himself at the turn of the millennium as the lead singer and
guitarist of the love-em-or-hate-em post-grunge rock outfit Nickelback. Born on
November 15, 1974, Kroeger taught himself how to play the guitar at age 13, but
got sidetracked a bit the following year when he was briefly sent to a juvenile
detention facility for repeatedly breaking into his junior high school to steal
money (an incident mentioned in the band's 2005 hit "Photograph"). Upon his
eventual release, he finished high school and began touring around in the early
'90s as the lead guitarist for a cover band in which he was performing with two
of his future Nickelback bandmates: older half-brother Mike Kroeger and friend
Ryan Peake. The band ultimately broke up, which is when Kroeger convinced some
friends to hit a studio with him to record several songs he'd been writing on
the side. Thus laying down the roots of Nickelback, these songs resulted in a
seven-song demo and, later, a self-released full-length that received
substantial airplay on various Canadian radio stations. Nickelback, which had
relocated from Hanna to Vancouver, slowly became stars in their homeland and
broke out on U.S. soil with their massive radio hit "How You Remind Me" from
2001. Kroeger was responsible for most of the band's lyrics, and especially
starting with the band's third record, 2001's Silver Side Up, he began writing
in a much more direct, less metaphorical manner, hitting personal topics like
failed relationships and the pain and anger associated with his father being
absent while growing up. As Nickelback's popularity grew throughout North
America -- alongside peers 3 Doors Down, Creed, and Puddle of Mudd -- Kroeger
took some separate time to indulge in various collaborations, including laying
down the 2002 hit single "Hero" with Saliva frontman Josey Scott for the
Spider-Man soundtrack. He also performed on Carlos Santana's album Shaman ("Why
Don't You and I") and did a cover of Elton John's "Saturday Night's Alright
(For Fighting)" with Kid Rock and Dimebag Darrell for the soundtrack to
Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle. Kroeger, who owns a studio in Vancouver, has
also done production work for rock acts like Default, Theory of a Deadman, and
Bo Bice, in addition to co-founding the Vancouver-based 604 Records in 2002. ~
Corey Apar, All Music Guide —
www.answers.com/topic/chad-kroeger
About Carlos Santana:
Delivered with a level of passion and soul equal to the legendary sonic charge
of his guitar, the sound of Carlos Santana is one of the world's best-known musical signatures. For more than four
decades – from Santana's earliest days as a groundbreaking
Afro-Latin-blues-rock fusion outfit in San Francisco – Carlos has been the
visionary force behind artistry that transcends musical genres, generational,
cultural and geographical boundaries. Long before the category now known as "world music" was named, Santana's
ever-evolving sound has always been ahead of its time in its universal appeal,
and today registers as ideally in sync with the 21st century's pan-cultural
landscape. And, with a dedication to humanitarian outreach and social activism
that parallels his lifelong relationship with music, Carlos Santana is as much
an exemplary world citizen as a global music icon. [To find more, go visit the "SANTANA - The Official Carlos Santana Web Site"
...] —
www.santana.com/carlos/default.aspx
Carlos Augusto Alves Santana (born 20 July, 1947) is a Mexican-born American Grammy Award-winning rock
musician and guitarist. Santana became famous in the late 1960s and early 1970s
with his band, Santana, which pioneered a blend of rock, salsa and jazz fusion.
The band's sound featured his melodic, blues-based guitar lines set against
Latin percussion such as timbales and congas. Santana continued to work in
these forms over the following decades. He experienced a sudden resurgence of
popularity and critical acclaim in the late 1990s. Rolling Stone also named
Santana number 15 on their list of the 100 Greatest Guitarists of All Time in 2003. —
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlos_Santana
Cheers!
Paul Quek Webmeister Woodlands, Singapore
| Incept Date: | | 05 August 2009 | | Rev'd Date: | | 02 April 2010 |
| | | | This website is predicated on the basis of the following categorization of the
Sciences ... Four Categories of Science By Stanton T. Friedman (Former Nuclear Physicist)Some people have insisted that if I can't provide a piece of a [flying] saucer
or an alien body, there is nothing to support my claims. I was quite surprised
during my last visit with Carl Sagan in December 1992, when he claimed that the
essence of the scientific method was reproducibility. In actuality, as I wrote
Sagan later on, there are at least four different kinds of science: - [Category-1 Science] Yes, there is a lot of excellent science done by people who set up
an experiment in which they can control all the variables and equipment. They
make measurements and then publish their results, after peer review, and
describe their equipment, instruments, and activity in detail so that others
can duplicate the work and, presumably, come to the same conclusions. Such
science can be very satisfying, and certainly can contribute to the advancement
of knowledge. However, it is not the only kind of science.
- [Category-2 Science] A second kind of science involves situations in which one cannot
control all the variables, but can predict some. For example, I cannot prove
that on occasion the moon comes directly between the sun and the Earth and
casts a shadow of darkness on the Earth, because I cannot control the positions
of the Earth, moon, or sun. What can be done is predicting the times when such
eclipses will happen and being ready to make observations when they occur.
Hopefully the weather where I have my instruments will allow me to make lots of
measurements.
- [Category-3 Science] A third kind of science involves events that can neither be
predicted nor controlled, but one can be ready to make measurements if
something does happen. For example, an array of seismographs can be established
to allow measurements to be made at several locations in the event of an
earthquake. When I was at the University of Chicago, a block of nuclear
emulsion was attached to a large balloon that would be released when a
radiation detector indicated that a solar storm had occurred (something we
could neither produce nor predict). Somebody would rush to Stagg Field and
release the balloon. When the balloon was
retrieved, the emulsion would be carefully examined to measure the number,
direction, velocity, and mass characteristics of particles unleashed by the sun.
- [Category-4 Science] Finally, there is a fourth kind of science, still using the rules
to attack difficult problems. These are the events that involve intelligence,
such as airplane crashes, murders, rapes, and automobile accidents. We do not
know when or where they will occur, but we do know they will. In a typical year
more than 40,000 Americans will be killed in automobile accidents. We don't
know where or when, so rarely are TV cameras whirling when these events take
place. But we can, after the fact, collect and evaluate evidence. We can
determine if the driver had high levels of alcohol in his or her blood, whether
the brakes failed, whether the visibility was poor, where a skid started, and
so on. Observations of strange phenomena in the sky come under this last
category.
In all the category-4 events, we must obtain as much testimony from witnesses
as possible. Some testimony is worth more than other testimony, perhaps because
of the duration of observation, the nearness of the witnesses to the event, the
specialized training of the observer, the availability of corroborative
evidence such as videos and still photos, or the consistency of evidence when
there is testimony from more than one witness. Our entire legal system is based
on testimony — rarely is there conclusive proof such as DNA
matching. Judges and juries must decide, with appropriate cross-examination,
who is telling the truth. In some states, testimony from one witness can lead
to the death penalty
for the accused. We should take note of the fact that even instrument data is dependent on
testimony from the observer of the instruments, and on appropriate calibration
and validation under standardized circumstances. Also, our courts place limits
on requirements for testimony, such as that against one spouse by the other.
Furthermore, there are rules about hearsay testimony, and rules regarding legal
evidence are complex and detailed. When it comes to flying saucers, we must remember that the reason most
sightings can be determined to be relatively conventional phenomena, often seen
under unusual circumstances, is that most people are relatively good observers.
The problem comes with the interpretation of what was observed. People watching
the sky late at night may get excited about a very bright light that moved very
slowly. Checking on the position of the planets at that time may reveal that
that light was Venus, because we have good information as to the angle of
observation, the direction of the light from the observer, the relatively slow
rate of motion, the location of Venus at that time, and so on. On three
occasions, when living in Southern California, I was called by people who
described an unusual object moving rapidly. I tried to make sure that I
analyzed their observations, such as, what time was it? In what direction were
you looking? In what direction did it seem to be moving? Was there any sound?
What was its apparent size, say, as compared to the moon (just covered by an
aspirin held at arm's length)? Two of the people wanted to tell me that the object was just over the next
hill. I stressed that this was an interpretation, because even huge objects far
away can seem to be small objects nearby. In all three cases, I felt that what
was being described sounded similar to a rocket launched down the California
Coast when the sun had gone down, but while the object was high enough to still
be in sunlight. I had seen such a spectacular case once myself. I checked, in
all three cases, with Vandenberg Air Force Base, which launches many rockets
down the U.S. West Coast. Indeed, there had been a launch at the right time in
each case. One case was especially intriguing, because several witnesses were
looking out across the ocean from a beach area and described the thing they saw
as similar to a string of popcorn. It turned out to be the launch of a special
weather satellite with extra solid boosters being dropped off multiple times. The people were good observers. To say the least, it would be irrational to say
that people are good observers when their input allows us to identify the
object being observed, and yet poor observers if we can't identify the UFO as
something conventional. — Stanton T. Friedman (Nuclear Physicist)
Flying Saucers and Science
Subtitle — A Scientist Investigates the Mysteries of UFOs: Interstellar Travel, Crashes,
and Government Cover-Ups
(Chapter 1 - "The Case for the ET Origin of Flying Saucers")
(Franklin Lakes, NJ: New Page Books, 2008)   | | | | |
| | | | Nine Points to Note - Recently, we added a simple blog so that you would be apprised of the latest
changes to the Mysteries of the World Website. To get the updates automatically, CLICK HERE to subscribe to our RSS (you will get a new window or 'tab'). Thanks and cheers!
Warning to the unthinking (and to the control freaks and power junkies) ... You probably won't like the following 'thinking' observation ... But it's
an important part of any exploration, investigation, study, etc. of the Mysteries of the World ... SEVEN DOORS TO SEVEN ROOMS OF THOUGHT- Accept the statement of Eminent Authority without basis, without question.
- Disagree with the statement without basis, out of general contrariness.
- Perhaps the statement is true, but what if it isn't? How then to account for
the phenomenon?
- How much of the statement rationalizes to suit man's purpose that he and his
shall be ascendant at the centre of things?
- What if the minor should become major, the recessive dominant, the obscure
prevalent?
- What if the statement were reversible, that which is considered effect is
really cause?
- What if the natural law perceived in one field also operates unperceived in all
other phases of science? What if there be only one natural law manifesting
itself, as yet, to us in many facets because we cannot apperceive the whole, of
which we have gained only the most elementary glimpses, with which we can cope
only at the crudest level?
And are those still other doors, yet undefined, on down the corridor? |
- Please do not assume or conclude that, just because I present many views (in
the form of textual notes, pictures/stills, and audio and video
clips) — as well as many advertisements, some by me and some
automatically by Google Adsense and Amazon — on this website,
it does not
mean that I am in agreement with or that I believe in the views and/or ads
offered-proferred ... That would be displaying such a parochial and provincial
attitude, towards this website and towards me as well!
As an ex-military officer, I assure you that I am in the habit of reading,
viewing and digesting lots of stuff that I don't necessarily believe in ... We
call all the stuff we read, view and digest, 'military intelligence' ... The
same applies with 'business intelligence' in the business world, of course. Our aim, as usual, is to find out what others (including our friends, enemies,
competitors, suppliers, strategic partners, business partners, etc.) believe
in. In order to do that effectively, we have to 'get out of the way', so to
speak — we have to remove our humongous
ego! — else we will never ever really have gotten started in
our journey of exploration and discovery of the Mysteries of the World. Furthermore, similarly and additionally, as a "Charismatic Christian", there
are lots of stuff presented in this website that I do not believe in ... which
had even led some to label me as "Fundamentalist"! ... Whatever! Matthew 7 1Judge not, that ye be not judged.2For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye
mete, it shall be measured to you again. 3And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest
not the beam that is in thine own eye? 4Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye;
and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye? 5Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt
thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye. — Jesus the Christ
(Yahoshua ha Mashiach;
Yeshua/Yesua; Ieosus; Joshua),
"Sermon on the Mount"
If you want to hear the NIV — specifically, from The Visual Bible: Matthew (1993) — please click the audio player below:
In short, in this website, I present many things that, I am hopeful, would be
of interest to a student, explorer and investigator of the Mysteries of the World ... but this doesn't mean that I believe in any of the stuff presented. ... Got it? ... Right! - Here is a purpose that I am wholeheartedly in agreement with ...
[Mysteries, Monsters, Mutants, Myths, Miracles & Much More ...]Our purpose ... is to describe the rich variety of anomalous, unexplained,
sometimes totally bizarre phenomena that people have experienced in all times
and places and that are still occurring today. ... the nature of the world and
of our existence are quite different from that which we were taught at school.
The reality is far more interesting, humorous and expansive than any religious
or rational, scientific world-view can possibly accommodate. It is not our intention here to dispute anyone's beliefs or
theories — but we should like to point out their limitations.
There are things that happen in this world - and have occurred throughout the
whole of human experience - for which there has never been a lasting
explanation. Explanations are temporary products, coming and going in response
to fashions. Meanwhile, the happenings they are supposed to explain carry on as
mysteriously as ever. — John Michell and Bob Rickard
The Rough Guide to Unexplained Phenomena (Rough Guide Reference)
(New York, NY: Rough Guides Ltd, 2007) - Here is a sentiment that I am wholeheartedly in agreement with ...
As I sit down to redo this book for an American audience, what rises before me
is last night's dream: I'm in a broad and beautiful land among many trees. It's
night. I look up at a huge old tree that's dark against the starry sky in its
detail of twig and branch. There is room enough here for all of us, I realize,
here in this big, intricately textured park. But I see that some want to cut
down the trees and level it out, so huge throngs of people can gather to gaze
up at the sun's glare. I watch dark twigs fingering the remote, untouchable
stars. A voice speaks: "Don't turn this into a Copernican Garden." Waking up, I remember that I went to sleep wondering how to put this book
together. And I take "Copernican Garden" to mean a parking lot vista where
masses gather to honor the bright sun of traditional science with its old rules
as the center of the universe. So I will not cut down the trees and level this book out. It is between you and
me [or you and I], a conversation as we stroll along in a moonlit fractal
garden past webby connections of thought that merge to patterned insight. Here
hidden delights nestle in scaling patterns of self-similar but never quite
repeating beauty. Here the tree of life hold stars in its branches. No matter
how huge, this garden stays human-sized because we have a place in it, you and
I. No need to cut down the connective forest and level things out for that
bright Sol [sun] of left-brain logic whose daytime dazzle — so
close and glaring — can blind us to the myriad constellations
beyond. [...] — Katya Walter, Tao of Chaos
Sub-title: Merging East and West
(1994, 1996) - Here is an observation (adapted) made in the Acknowledgement page of a book ...
It takes many minds to produce a book [including an e-book, of course].
Although most authors [especially of non-fiction books and articles] would
prefer not to admit this fact, fundamentally they are merely 'synthesisers' of
accumulated knowledge. The process of synthesising may unveil a new reality map, or paradigm, which,
in due course, will be used by future pioneers to unveil further paradigms. This principle was summed up by Sir Isaac Newton when he remarked: "If I have
seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants". [...] — Christian von Nidda, Our Secret Planet
(2005) - Here is an observation about UFO-Aliens cover-up or conspiracy that may be of
general interest, although some readers would not agree with the observation
(e.g., they may say that some whistleblowers, such as Bob Lazar on the
Roswell-type flying saucers in secret Area-51 labs, have already come forward)
...
If any long-term coherent cover up of UFO information does exist, however, then
it must operate at all levels of government and the media. It must encompass
all the relevant written materials, from the briefest handwritten note in
government files to entries in squadron log books to letters in the personal
papers of members of the Establishment. Hundreds of politicians, service
personnel, police officers, clerks and officials, over half a century, would be
required to excise any reference to the reality of UFOs from official documents
and the media. The number of people who would have taken part in this cover up
would be vast, yet not one person has broken ranks to 'blow the whistle' on the
greatest story ever told. Meantime, millions of dollars are being spent every
day on space probes and radio telescopes that are searching for evidence of
alien life. Would there be any reason for a conspiracy of silence if that
evidence already existed? — Dr David Clarke and Andy Roberts, Out of the Shadows
(2002) - Even though I am a "Charismatic Christian", the views presented herewith, in
this Mysteries of the World Website, will NOT be colored by this fact of being a Charismatic Christian. Rather, where and
when I find it necessary (and usually, I would NOT find it necessary, since I find it tiresome to repeat myself, again and again
and again ..., ad infinitum ..., but if I should find it necessary to repeat myself), I will then state
what my Charismatic Christian beliefs lead me to believe
in — even though I am aware that my own Charismatic Christian
beliefs may or may not be the same as, or in accord with, those beliefs of
others who also may want to regard themselves as Charismatic Christians
(nb/note well: there appears to be so many varieties of Charismatic Christian
beliefs, including from those who are simultaneously of the
traditional-historical denominations — such as the Roman
Catholics, with their purgatories, mortal and venial sins, and their Mother
this and Mother that. Shudder! Shudder! Shudder!).
Thus, for example, I do not necessarily "believe" in "ghosts", even as I (will
later) examine the entire gamut of so-called "paranormal events or phenomena",
especially of those with a psychic bent (truly, these are bent!, as in
less-than-straight, aka "crooked", thinking variety). Many so-called "ghosts"
are probably some form of "fallen angels" or "demons" of the Biblical kind,
masquerading as either gods, demons, spirits, ghosts, or even "angels of light"
(when they are obviously "fallen" and are "angels of darkness", or "sons of
darkness" as used in one of the Dead Sea Scrolls, i.e. The War of the Sons of Light Against the Sons of Darkness). Anyway, the author of 1 John, gave us a simple test against any "spirit" to see
whether that spirit is of light (God; Christ/Son of God; Holy Spirit of
God/Comforter/Advocate/Paraclete/The One; Jehovah/Yahveh/Yahweh/God the Father)
or of darkness (Satan, Lucifer, the Devil; the Anti-Christ; the False Prophet;
the Beast): 2This is how you can recognize the Spirit of God: Every spirit that acknowledges
that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, 3but every spirit that does not acknowledge Jesus is not from God. This is the
spirit of the antichrist, which you have heard is coming and even now is
already in the world. — First Epistle of John
(1 John 4:2-3; New
International Version/NIV)
(Note: many Catholics like NIV
and dislike KJV! Tough!) Whatever the case may be about "ghosts" and other "apparitions", in this
website, I have stated that we will be truth-based and science-based. Despite
this, definitely, I will not be ashamed of being a Charismatic Christian or of
God's Word:If anyone is ashamed of me and my words, the Son of Man will be ashamed of him
when he comes in his glory and in the glory of the Father and of the holy
angels. (Spoken by Jesus and recorded in Luke 9:26; NIV)If anyone is ashamed of me and my words in this adulterous and sinful
generation, the Son of Man will be ashamed of him when he comes in his Father's
glory with the holy angels. (Spoken by Jesus and recorded in Mark 8:38; NIV) I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power of God for the
salvation of everyone who believes: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile. (Apostle Paul, in his Epistle to the Romans; Romans 1:16; NIV)
| | | | |
Check our Mysteries Blog to see the latest changes to our webpages and 'web articles' (click on the Mysteries Blog button on the LEFT NavBar)
As stated in our Mysteries Blog, the ' Mysteries of the World' Website does NOT aim to sensationalize any particular 'Mystery', although we
will examine and explore all possible viewpoints pertaining to each
'Mystery' — including the fringe AND the mainstream. We will, of course, come to a conclusion ( eventually!) about each 'Mystery' ... even if that conclusion may eventually turn out to
be 'as yet unresolved' or 'unexplained to our satisfaction'.
|
This is a KFCP ... No, not Kentucky Fried Chicken Plate ... KFCP stands for "keyword-focused content page" ... This Tier 3 webpage is based on the keyword "chad kroeger".
|  |
or 
) ...
