| | |
| | Breadcrumbs: Home [Tier 1] → Short-Shorts [Tier 2] → Mysterious Planet Lake Monsters [Tier 3] Mysterious Planet Lake Monsters | |
| From: "Short-Shorts"Short Takes on Interesting ("Quixotic") Topics
|
Taglines: | Mysterious Planet Lake Monsters — do these cryptids really
exist? |
by Paul Quek, from Singapore BBA (Hons), MAppSci (CompSci) [Bachelor of Business Administration, Honours]
[Master of Applied Science, Computing Science] Check this out: Cool Software! (New window opens)
| Incept Date: | | 05 July 2009 | | Rev'd Date: | | 10 September 2009 |
Mysterious Planet Lake Monsters
Uploaded to YouTube by: MichaelSGoldermann Date of Upload: January 16, 2009 Description: MYSTERIOUS PLANET EPISODE-3
For decades, mysterious creatures have been sighted, photographed, and
videotaped in countless lakes across the planet. Proof and possible answers
will be explained in this installment of Mysterious Planet. Tags: mysterious mystery planet lake monster monsters Loch Ness Monster
loch ness Champ champ Champlain Ogopogo ogopogo Okanagan Nessie
nessie Van Turkey Tianchi China Canada Memphremagog Nahuel Huapi
Seljordsvatnet Tahoe Nahuelito plesiosaur dinosaur serpent river water
fresh dinosaurs cadborosaurus Cadborosaurus world scary proof creepy
real freaky cryptid Cryptid Cryptozoology cryptozoology cryptids
Cryptids
"Proof that lake monsters exist"
Uploaded to YouTube by: xzys10z Date of Upload: December 04, 2007 Description: I took this video outside my cottage on Lake Scugog, Ontario in September
2007. Tags:
lake monster loch ness proof cryptozoology real evidence
"CHINA LAKE MONSTERS (Italian tv-news)"
Uploaded to YouTube by: shout66 Date of Upload: September 17, 2007 Description: six monsters videotaped by a Chinese journalist at Lake Tianchi (close to
Korean borders) September 2007 Tags: mostri lago cina china chinese monster monsters lake tianchi
korea korean borders journalist sighting avvistamento
"Lake Superior Monster Witness"
Uploaded to YouTube by: ufodigest Date of Upload: March 11, 2008 Description: When Randy Braun looked straight out to open water he saw two very
distinct dark bumps which seemed to be separated by just a few feet. First, one
bump would go underwater then the next bump would do the same, but only after
the first one surfaced. He returned to Lake Superior and made this video. To
read more about this sighting visit ufodigest.com. Also hear exclusive
interview! Tags: lake superior monster randy braun reptile wildlife
"'Champ' the sea monster of Lake Champlain"
Uploaded to YouTube by: SOZwrestling Date of Upload: November 30, 2008 Description: Hundreds claim to have seen this serpent, similar to the Loch Ness
monster, in Lake Champlain. Tags: lake champlain champ sea monster loch ness serpent prehistoric
mammal
"The Lake Champlain Monster, and the King James Bible Code"
Uploaded to YouTube by: revelation13net Date of Upload: September 15, 2007 Description: Lake Champlain between Vermont and New York in the U.S. is said to have a
lake monster dinosaur creature called Champ. We look at this subject and the
Loch Ness Scotland monster Nessie with the King James version English Bible
Code, using Bible Code software. Do these sea serpent creatures really exist?
Are they Plesiosaur dinosaurs? Champ has been seen many times. Copyright 2007 by T. Chase. From the Revelation13.net web site, for more on this see Revelation13.net
(Revelation 13: Prophecies of the Future, Astrology, Nostradamus, Bible
Prophecy, the King James version English Bible Code). Tags: Champ dinosaur Lake Champlain New York Nessie Loch Ness Scotland
monster creature Vermont Bible Code software matrix
 |  |  |  | Mysterious Planet Lake Monsters Lake monster
(Wikipedia)
Lake monster or loch monster is a term referring to purported fresh-water dwelling megafauna appearing in
mythology, rumor, or local folklore, but whose existence lacks scientific
support. A well known example is the Loch Ness Monster. Lake monsters'
depictions are often similar to some sea monsters. They are principally the
subject of investigations by followers of the pseudoscience of cryptozoology. ExplanationsMany skeptics consider lake monsters to be purely exaggerations or
misinterpretations of known and natural phenomena, or else fabrications and
hoaxes. Most lake monsters have no evidence besides alleged sightings and
controversial photographs and a large portion are generally believed not to
exist by conventional zoology and allied sciences. Misidentified sightings of
seals, otters, deer, diving water birds, large fish such as giant sturgeons,
logs, mirages, seiches, light distortion, crossing boat wakes, or unusual wave
patterns have all been proposed to explain specific reports[citation needed].
Social scientists point out that descriptions of these creatures vary over time
with the values and mood of the local cultures, following the pattern of folk
beliefs and not what would be expected if the reports were of actual encounters
with real animals. According to the Swedish naturalist and author Bengt Sjögren (1980), the
present day belief in lake-monsters is associated with the legends of
kelpies[citation needed]. Sjögren claims that the accounts of lake-monsters
have changed during history. Older reports often talk about horse-like
appearances, but more modern reports often have more reptile and
dinosaur-like-appearances, and Sjögren concludes that the legends of kelpies
evolved into the present day legends of lake-monsters where the monsters
changed the appearance since the discovery of dinosaurs and giant aquatic
reptiles from the horse-like water-kelpie to a dinosaur-like reptile, often a
plesiosaur. Other widely varied theories have been presented by believers, including
unknown species of giant freshwater eels or surviving aquatic, prehistoric
reptiles, such as plesiosaurs. One theory holds that the monsters that are
sighted are the occasional full-grown form of an amphibian species that
generally stays juvenile all its life like the axolotl. Cryptozoologist Bernard
Heuvelmans held throughout his life that plesiosaur-type sighting were actually
an unknown species of long-necked seal. In many of these areas, especially around Loch Ness, Lake Champlain and the
Okanagan Valley, these lake monsters have become important tourist draws.
|  |  |  |  |
| | | |
Mysterious Planet Lake Monsters
The Cryptid Zoo: Lake Monsters www.newanimal.org/lake-monsters.htm Dozens of lakes around the world are supposed to house "monsters" of various
sorts. Water cryptids from places other than the ocean are collectively called
"lake monsters" because very few of these creatures are reported from rivers or
ponds, and even in the case of river monsters, such rivers often connect to
lakes with a history of monster sightings. Many lake monsters are said to look similar to sea serpents. Picture copyright
2006 by Jamie Hall.
There are two main categories for these creatures. Some lake monsters look much
like sea serpents or Nessie, Scotland's Loch Ness Monster, with a long,
serpentine body, perhaps with paddles or humps, and a head that is shaped
somewhat like that of a horse. These creatures all seem to be related to each
other, and they were first explained by cryptozoologists as living plesiosaurs,
primitive reptiles, though today the concensus has switched to zeuglodons, a
weird, primitive whale that is supposed to be extinct. Some other lake monsters
seem even more dragon-like, and these often have supernatural powers attributed
to them. On the more normal end of the spectrum, some lake monsters seem to resemble
animals that we are more familiar with, such as giant turtles or giant
crocodiles. The creatures in this other category are quite varied, linked only
by the fact that they do not resemble sea serpents. Creatures in this group
include the gigantic, hairy monsters like seals with canine faces that are said
to reside in Lake Simcoe and Muskrat Lake in Ontario, Canada, and the school of
twenty-foot mystery fish that are reported from Iliamna Lake in Alaska. Most lakes that are supposed to house monsters are in remote areas, are very
big, or both. Iliamna Lake is over a thousand square miles in area and more
than a thousand feet deep. Unless these monsters have the ability to waddle
onto land, draining the lake in question would answer the question of whether a
monster was in it once and for all, but researchers are understandably
reluctant to do this. Even when such an option isn't too expensive, it would
destroy a valuable ecosystem and, if there is a monster, kill it. Most
cryptozoologists are afraid of making a new animal extinct just to prove that
it had once existed. | | | | |
| | | |
Mysterious Planet Lake Monsters
Monsters Sightings www.monsterssightings.com/category/lake-monster-sightings Lake Tahoe’s Lake MonsterTahoe Tessie is a very popular legendary creature and it is supposed to be
residing in Lake Tahoe in Nevada. The tales associated with Tessie firmly say
that this creature is dwelling in the lake. In the mid 1800s the stories of
Tessie where told by the members of Washoe and Paiute tribes. Those who have
seen this creature describe it as over 60 feet long creature with dark skin,
serpentine and swelling body. This lake monster has believed to look very much like reptilians. Today also it is believed that
this legendary creature is still dwelling in the Lake Tahoe in Nevada. Many
people tell stories that they have seen this creature but still there is no
proof of its existence till now. The stories of Tessie are so popular in this area that the lake is now known as
“Tahoe Tessie”. There are several reports that a large creature is living in
the waters of this lake. Since the time this lake is there people believe the
stories of Tessie and not only this many were sure that they have seen it in
the waters of this lake. Today also many people who go to visit this lake
confirm that they have seen this creature. Jaques Cousteau also went to find
out about the existence of this creature in the waters of Lake Tahoe but he
never told about his findings to anyone. His findings and film footage were not
been made public. According to him the world is still not ready to know what is
there down in the Lake Tahoe. But as he has not made his findings public, the
mystery associated with Tessie still continues. Actually the rumors about the existence of some large creature in Lake Tahoe
started from some rumor that a scaly creature is residing in the deep waters of
this lake. These rumors then passed on from generations to generations. Even if
there is no proof about the existence of Tessie, people believe it and share
these stories with their next generations. That’s how this rumor lived for so
long. Lake Tahoe a 1,645 Feet Deep Abysis
Lake Tahoe is the world’s tenth deepest lake and its water is 1,645 feet deep.
This lake is 22 miles long and 12 miles wide. This lake has gained good
popularity due to the rumor that a scaly serpentine like creature is residing
in it. People from all over the world come to visit this lake in order to try
their luck whether they can get some pictures of this strange creature so as to
solve the unsolved mystery. Every time anyone says that he or she has seen some
strange creature the stories of Tessie again starts spreading and people come
with hopes to see this creature. | | | | |
Cheers! Paul Quek
Webmeister
Woodlands, Singapore| Incept Date: | | 05 July 2009 | | Rev'd Date: | | 10 September 2009 |
| | | | This website is predicated on the basis of the following categorization of the
Sciences ... Four Categories of Science By Stanton T. Friedman (Former Nuclear Physicist)Some people have insisted that if I can't provide a piece of a [flying] saucer
or an alien body, there is nothing to support my claims. I was quite surprised
during my last visit with Carl Sagan in December 1992, when he claimed that the
essence of the scientific method was reproducibility. In actuality, as I wrote
Sagan later on, there are at least four different kinds of science: - [Category-1 Science] Yes, there is a lot of excellent science done by people who set up
an experiment in which they can control all the variables and equipment. They
make measurements and then publish their results, after peer review, and
describe their equipment, instruments, and activity in detail so that others
can duplicate the work and, presumably, come to the same conclusions. Such
science can be very satisfying, and certainly can contribute to the advancement
of knowledge. However, it is not the only kind of science.
- [Category-2 Science] A second kind of science involves situations in which one cannot
control all the variables, but can predict some. For example, I cannot prove
that on occasion the moon comes directly between the sun and the Earth and
casts a shadow of darkness on the Earth, because I cannot control the positions
of the Earth, moon, or sun. What can be done is predicting the times when such
eclipses will happen and being ready to make observations when they occur.
Hopefully the weather where I have my instruments will allow me to make lots of
measurements.
- [Category-3 Science] A third kind of science involves events that can neither be
predicted nor controlled, but one can be ready to make measurements if
something does happen. For example, an array of seismographs can be established
to allow measurements to be made at several locations in the event of an
earthquake. When I was at the University of Chicago, a block of nuclear
emulsion was attached to a large balloon that would be released when a
radiation detector indicated that a solar storm had occurred (something we
could neither produce nor predict). Somebody would rush to Stagg Field and
release the balloon. When the balloon was
retrieved, the emulsion would be carefully examined to measure the number,
direction, velocity, and mass characteristics of particles unleashed by the sun.
- [Category-4 Science] Finally, there is a fourth kind of science, still using the rules
to attack difficult problems. These are the events that involve intelligence,
such as airplane crashes, murders, rapes, and automobile accidents. We do not
know when or where they will occur, but we do know they will. In a typical year
more than 40,000 Americans will be killed in automobile accidents. We don't
know where or when, so rarely are TV cameras whirling when these events take
place. But we can, after the fact, collect and evaluate evidence. We can
determine if the driver had high levels of alcohol in his or her blood, whether
the brakes failed, whether the visibility was poor, where a skid started, and
so on. Observations of strange phenomena in the sky come under this last
category.
In all the category-4 events, we must obtain as much testimony from witnesses
as possible. Some testimony is worth more than other testimony, perhaps because
of the duration of observation, the nearness of the witnesses to the event, the
specialized training of the observer, the availability of corroborative
evidence such as videos and still photos, or the consistency of evidence when
there is testimony from more than one witness. Our entire legal system is based
on testimony — rarely is there conclusive proof such as DNA
matching. Judges and juries must decide, with appropriate cross-examination,
who is telling the truth. In some states, testimony from one witness can lead
to the death penalty
for the accused. We should take note of the fact that even instrument data is dependent on
testimony from the observer of the instruments, and on appropriate calibration
and validation under standardized circumstances. Also, our courts place limits
on requirements for testimony, such as that against one spouse by the other.
Furthermore, there are rules about hearsay testimony, and rules regarding legal
evidence are complex and detailed. When it comes to flying saucers, we must remember that the reason most
sightings can be determined to be relatively conventional phenomena, often seen
under unusual circumstances, is that most people are relatively good observers.
The problem comes with the interpretation of what was observed. People watching
the sky late at night may get excited about a very bright light that moved very
slowly. Checking on the position of the planets at that time may reveal that
that light was Venus, because we have good information as to the angle of
observation, the direction of the light from the observer, the relatively slow
rate of motion, the location of Venus at that time, and so on. On three
occasions, when living in Southern California, I was called by people who
described an unusual object moving rapidly. I tried to make sure that I
analyzed their observations, such as, what time was it? In what direction were
you looking? In what direction did it seem to be moving? Was there any sound?
What was its apparent size, say, as compared to the moon (just covered by an
aspirin held at arm's length)? Two of the people wanted to tell me that the object was just over the next
hill. I stressed that this was an interpretation, because even huge objects far
away can seem to be small objects nearby. In all three cases, I felt that what
was being described sounded similar to a rocket launched down the California
Coast when the sun had gone down, but while the object was high enough to still
be in sunlight. I had seen such a spectacular case once myself. I checked, in
all three cases, with Vandenberg Air Force Base, which launches many rockets
down the U.S. West Coast. Indeed, there had been a launch at the right time in
each case. One case was especially intriguing, because several witnesses were
looking out across the ocean from a beach area and described the thing they saw
as similar to a string of popcorn. It turned out to be the launch of a special
weather satellite with extra solid boosters being dropped off multiple times. The people were good observers. To say the least, it would be irrational to say
that people are good observers when their input allows us to identify the
object being observed, and yet poor observers if we can't identify the UFO as
something conventional. — Stanton T. Friedman (Nuclear Physicist)
Flying Saucers and Science
Subtitle — A Scientist Investigates the Mysteries of UFOs: Interstellar Travel, Crashes,
and Government Cover-Ups
(Chapter 1 - "The Case for the ET Origin of Flying Saucers")
(Franklin Lakes, NJ: New Page Books, 2008)   | | | | |
| | | | Nine Points to Note - Recently, we added a simple blog so that you would be apprised of the latest
changes to the Mysteries of the World Website. To get the updates automatically, CLICK HERE to subscribe to our RSS (you will get a new window or 'tab'). Thanks and cheers!
Warning to the unthinking (and to the control freaks and power junkies) ... You probably won't like the following 'thinking' observation ... But it's
an important part of any exploration, investigation, study, etc. of the Mysteries of the World ... SEVEN DOORS TO SEVEN ROOMS OF THOUGHT- Accept the statement of Eminent Authority without basis, without question.
- Disagree with the statement without basis, out of general contrariness.
- Perhaps the statement is true, but what if it isn't? How then to account for
the phenomenon?
- How much of the statement rationalizes to suit man's purpose that he and his
shall be ascendant at the centre of things?
- What if the minor should become major, the recessive dominant, the obscure
prevalent?
- What if the statement were reversible, that which is considered effect is
really cause?
- What if the natural law perceived in one field also operates unperceived in all
other phases of science? What if there be only one natural law manifesting
itself, as yet, to us in many facets because we cannot apperceive the whole, of
which we have gained only the most elementary glimpses, with which we can cope
only at the crudest level?
And are those still other doors, yet undefined, on down the corridor? |
- Please do not assume or conclude that, just because I present many views (in
the form of textual notes, pictures/stills, and audio and video
clips) — as well as many advertisements, some by me and some
automatically by Google Adsense and Amazon — on this website,
it does not
mean that I am in agreement with or that I believe in the views and/or ads
offered-proferred ... That would be displaying such a parochial and provincial
attitude, towards this website and towards me as well!
As an ex-military officer, I assure you that I am in the habit of reading,
viewing and digesting lots of stuff that I don't necessarily believe in ... We
call all the stuff we read, view and digest, 'military intelligence' ... The
same applies with 'business intelligence' in the business world, of course. Our aim, as usual, is to find out what others (including our friends, enemies,
competitors, suppliers, strategic partners, business partners, etc.) believe
in. In order to do that effectively, we have to 'get out of the way', so to
speak — we have to remove our humongous
ego! — else we will never ever really have gotten started in
our journey of exploration and discovery of the Mysteries of the World. Furthermore, similarly and additionally, as a "Charismatic Christian", there
are lots of stuff presented in this website that I do not believe in ... which
had even led some to label me as "Fundamentalist"! ... Whatever! Matthew 7 1Judge not, that ye be not judged.2For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye
mete, it shall be measured to you again. 3And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest
not the beam that is in thine own eye? 4Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye;
and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye? 5Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt
thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye. — Jesus the Christ
(Yahoshua ha Mashiach;
Yeshua/Yesua; Ieosus; Joshua),
"Sermon on the Mount"
If you want to hear the NIV — specifically, from The Visual Bible: Matthew (1993) — please click the audio player below:
In short, in this website, I present many things that, I am hopeful, would be
of interest to a student, explorer and investigator of the Mysteries of the World ... but this doesn't mean that I believe in any of the stuff presented. ... Got it? ... Right! - Here is a purpose that I am wholeheartedly in agreement with ...
[Mysteries, Monsters, Mutants, Myths, Miracles & Much More ...]Our purpose ... is to describe the rich variety of anomalous, unexplained,
sometimes totally bizarre phenomena that people have experienced in all times
and places and that are still occurring today. ... the nature of the world and
of our existence are quite different from that which we were taught at school.
The reality is far more interesting, humorous and expansive than any religious
or rational, scientific world-view can possibly accommodate. It is not our intention here to dispute anyone's beliefs or
theories — but we should like to point out their limitations.
There are things that happen in this world - and have occurred throughout the
whole of human experience - for which there has never been a lasting
explanation. Explanations are temporary products, coming and going in response
to fashions. Meanwhile, the happenings they are supposed to explain carry on as
mysteriously as ever. — John Michell and Bob Rickard
The Rough Guide to Unexplained Phenomena (Rough Guide Reference)
(New York, NY: Rough Guides Ltd, 2007) - Here is a sentiment that I am wholeheartedly in agreement with ...
As I sit down to redo this book for an American audience, what rises before me
is last night's dream: I'm in a broad and beautiful land among many trees. It's
night. I look up at a huge old tree that's dark against the starry sky in its
detail of twig and branch. There is room enough here for all of us, I realize,
here in this big, intricately textured park. But I see that some want to cut
down the trees and level it out, so huge throngs of people can gather to gaze
up at the sun's glare. I watch dark twigs fingering the remote, untouchable
stars. A voice speaks: "Don't turn this into a Copernican Garden." Waking up, I remember that I went to sleep wondering how to put this book
together. And I take "Copernican Garden" to mean a parking lot vista where
masses gather to honor the bright sun of traditional science with its old rules
as the center of the universe. So I will not cut down the trees and level this book out. It is between you and
me [or you and I], a conversation as we stroll along in a moonlit fractal
garden past webby connections of thought that merge to patterned insight. Here
hidden delights nestle in scaling patterns of self-similar but never quite
repeating beauty. Here the tree of life hold stars in its branches. No matter
how huge, this garden stays human-sized because we have a place in it, you and
I. No need to cut down the connective forest and level things out for that
bright Sol [sun] of left-brain logic whose daytime dazzle — so
close and glaring — can blind us to the myriad constellations
beyond. [...] — Katya Walter, Tao of Chaos
Sub-title: Merging East and West
(1994, 1996) - Here is an observation (adapted) made in the Acknowledgement page of a book ...
It takes many minds to produce a book [including an e-book, of course].
Although most authors [especially of non-fiction books and articles] would
prefer not to admit this fact, fundamentally they are merely 'synthesisers' of
accumulated knowledge. The process of synthesising may unveil a new reality map, or paradigm, which,
in due course, will be used by future pioneers to unveil further paradigms. This principle was summed up by Sir Isaac Newton when he remarked: "If I have
seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants". [...] — Christian von Nidda, Our Secret Planet
(2005) - Here is an observation about UFO-Aliens cover-up or conspiracy that may be of
general interest, although some readers would not agree with the observation
(e.g., they may say that some whistleblowers, such as Bob Lazar on the
Roswell-type flying saucers in secret Area-51 labs, have already come forward)
...
If any long-term coherent cover up of UFO information does exist, however, then
it must operate at all levels of government and the media. It must encompass
all the relevant written materials, from the briefest handwritten note in
government files to entries in squadron log books to letters in the personal
papers of members of the Establishment. Hundreds of politicians, service
personnel, police officers, clerks and officials, over half a century, would be
required to excise any reference to the reality of UFOs from official documents
and the media. The number of people who would have taken part in this cover up
would be vast, yet not one person has broken ranks to 'blow the whistle' on the
greatest story ever told. Meantime, millions of dollars are being spent every
day on space probes and radio telescopes that are searching for evidence of
alien life. Would there be any reason for a conspiracy of silence if that
evidence already existed? — Dr David Clarke and Andy Roberts, Out of the Shadows
(2002) - Even though I am a "Charismatic Christian", the views presented herewith, in
this Mysteries of the World Website, will NOT be colored by this fact of being a Charismatic Christian. Rather, where and
when I find it necessary (and usually, I would NOT find it necessary, since I find it tiresome to repeat myself, again and again
and again ..., ad infinitum ..., but if I should find it necessary to repeat myself), I will then state
what my Charismatic Christian beliefs lead me to believe
in — even though I am aware that my own Charismatic Christian
beliefs may or may not be the same as, or in accord with, those beliefs of
others who also may want to regard themselves as Charismatic Christians
(nb/note well: there appears to be so many varieties of Charismatic Christian
beliefs, including from those who are simultaneously of the
traditional-historical denominations — such as the Roman
Catholics, with their purgatories, mortal and venial sins, and their Mother
this and Mother that. Shudder! Shudder! Shudder!).
Thus, for example, I do not necessarily "believe" in "ghosts", even as I (will
later) examine the entire gamut of so-called "paranormal events or phenomena",
especially of those with a psychic bent (truly, these are bent!, as in
less-than-straight, aka "crooked", thinking variety). Many so-called "ghosts"
are probably some form of "fallen angels" or "demons" of the Biblical kind,
masquerading as either gods, demons, spirits, ghosts, or even "angels of light"
(when they are obviously "fallen" and are "angels of darkness", or "sons of
darkness" as used in one of the Dead Sea Scrolls, i.e. The War of the Sons of Light Against the Sons of Darkness). Anyway, the author of 1 John, gave us a simple test against any "spirit" to see
whether that spirit is of light (God; Christ/Son of God; Holy Spirit of
God/Comforter/Advocate/Paraclete/The One; Jehovah/Yahveh/Yahweh/God the Father)
or of darkness (Satan, Lucifer, the Devil; the Anti-Christ; the False Prophet;
the Beast): 2This is how you can recognize the Spirit of God: Every spirit that acknowledges
that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, 3but every spirit that does not acknowledge Jesus is not from God. This is the
spirit of the antichrist, which you have heard is coming and even now is
already in the world. — First Epistle of John
(1 John 4:2-3; New
International Version/NIV)
(Note: many Catholics like NIV
and dislike KJV! Tough!) Whatever the case may be about "ghosts" and other "apparitions", in this
website, I have stated that we will be truth-based and science-based. Despite
this, definitely, I will not be ashamed of being a Charismatic Christian or of
God's Word:If anyone is ashamed of me and my words, the Son of Man will be ashamed of him
when he comes in his glory and in the glory of the Father and of the holy
angels. (Spoken by Jesus and recorded in Luke 9:26; NIV)If anyone is ashamed of me and my words in this adulterous and sinful
generation, the Son of Man will be ashamed of him when he comes in his Father's
glory with the holy angels. (Spoken by Jesus and recorded in Mark 8:38; NIV) I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power of God for the
salvation of everyone who believes: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile. (Apostle Paul, in his Epistle to the Romans; Romans 1:16; NIV)
| | | | |
Check our Mysteries Blog to see the latest changes to our webpages and 'web articles' (click on the Mysteries Blog button on the LEFT NavBar)
As stated in our Mysteries Blog, the ' Mysteries of the World' Website does NOT aim to sensationalize any particular 'Mystery', although we
will examine and explore all possible viewpoints pertaining to each
'Mystery' — including the fringe AND the mainstream. We will, of course, come to a conclusion ( eventually!) about each 'Mystery' ... even if that conclusion may eventually turn out to
be 'as yet unresolved' or 'unexplained to our satisfaction'.
|
|
or 
) ...
