| | | | Quantum Mechanics
- Notes & YouTube Videos
| | |
|
Tagline: Why are we dreaming at all???!!! by Paul Quek, from Singapore BBA (Hons), MAppSci (CompSci) [Bachelor of Business Administration, Honours]
[Master of Applied Science, Computing Science] Check this out: Cool Software! (New window opens) | Incept Date: | | 31 May 2009 | | Rev'd Date: | | 21 July 2009 |
 Latest Updates!
(New window opens) | |
| |  Notes on Browsers
(New window opens) | | | |  Announcement! - Roswell Rock
(New window opens) | | |
Check our Mysteries Blog to see the latest webpages and
'web articles' that have been UPDATED!
(Click on the Mysteries Blog button on the left NAVBAR.)
"Quantum Mechanics The Uncertainty Principle Light Particle's"
Uploaded to YouTube by: Acorvettes
Date of Upload: August 04, 2007
Description: http://www.myspace.com/acorvettes
Single photons are the smallest quantities of light and, despite having no
mass, have many properties in common with particles. In fact, physicists often
think of photons as particles -- particles that sometimes behave like waves.
Physicists sometimes describe all particles as waves -- even those with mass,
such as electrons and protons -- in order to better understand certain aspects
of their behavior.
Tags: Quantum Mechanics Atoms Niels Bohr Rutherford
1.0 PrologThis web article examines the intriguing topic of Quantum Mechanics ...
2.0 Notes
Wikipedia — the very useful, user-editable and free online
encyclopedia — explains 'Quantum Mechanics' as follows ... Quantum mechanics Quantum mechanics is a set of principles underlying the most fundamental known description of all
physical systems at the submicroscopic scale (at the atomic level). Notable among these principles are both a dual wave-like and particle-like
behavior of matter and radiation, and prediction of probabilities in situations
where classical physics predicts certainties. Classical physics can be derived as a good approximation to quantum physics,
typically in circumstances with large numbers of particles. Thus quantum phenomena are particularly relevant in systems whose dimensions
are close to the atomic scale, such as molecules, atoms, electrons, protons and
other subatomic particles. Exceptions exist for certain systems which exhibit quantum mechanical effects
on macroscopic scale; superfluidity is one well-known example. Quantum theory provides accurate descriptions for many previously unexplained
phenomena such as black body radiation and stable electron orbits. It has also given insight into the workings of many different biological
systems, including smell receptors and protein structures.
Overview
The word quantum is Latin for "how great" or "how much." In quantum mechanics, it refers to a discrete unit that quantum theory assigns
to certain physical quantities, such as the energy of an atom at rest (see
Figure 1, at right). The discovery that waves have discrete energy packets (called quanta) that behave in a manner similar to particles led to the branch of physics
that deals with atomic and subatomic systems which we today call quantum mechanics. It is the underlying mathematical framework of many fields of physics and
chemistry, including condensed matter physics, solid-state physics, atomic
physics, molecular physics, computational chemistry, quantum chemistry,
particle physics, and nuclear physics. The foundations of quantum mechanics were established during the first half of
the twentieth century by Werner Heisenberg, Max Planck, Louis de Broglie,
Albert Einstein, Niels Bohr, Erwin Schrödinger, Max Born, John von Neumann,
Paul Dirac, Wolfgang Pauli, William Hamilton, David Hilbert, and others. Some
fundamental aspects of the theory are still actively studied. Quantum mechanics is essential to understand the behavior of systems at atomic
length scales and smaller. For example, if classical mechanics governed the
workings of an atom, electrons would rapidly travel towards and collide with
the nucleus, making stable atoms impossible. However, in the natural world the
electrons normally remain in an uncertain, non-deterministic "smeared"
(wave-particle wave function) orbital path around or "thru" the nucleus,
defying classical electromagnetism.
"Quantum Mechanics" [Acorvettes; August 04, 2007] Uploaded to YouTube by: Acorvettes
Date of Upload: August 04, 2007
Description: http://www.myspace.com/acorvettes
The Danish physicist Niels Bohr, who worked in Rutherford's lab, was the first
to describe orbits of fixed size and energy in which electrons are free to
travel without losing energy and falling toward the nucleus. According to this
model, published in 1913, electrons can only occupy or jump between fixed
energy levels and cannot reside in between these levels. In addition, once in
their "ground state," electrons maintain the energy they contain. This energy
keeps them in perpetual motion, allowing them to resist the attractive force of
the nucleus.
Tags: Quantum Mechanics Atoms Niels Bohr Rutherford
Quantum mechanics was initially developed to provide a better explanation of
the atom, especially the spectra of light emitted by different atomic species.
The quantum theory of the atom was developed as an explanation for the
electron's staying in its orbital, which could not be explained by Newton's
laws of motion and by Maxwell's laws of classical electromagnetism. In the formalism of quantum mechanics, the state of a system at a given time is
described by a complex wave function (sometimes referred to as orbitals in the case of atomic electrons), and more generally, elements of a complex vector space. This abstract mathematical object allows for the calculation of probabilities
of outcomes of concrete experiments. For example, it allows one to compute the
probability of finding an electron in a particular region around the nucleus at
a particular time. Contrary to classical mechanics, one can never make
simultaneous predictions of conjugate variables, such as position and momentum, with arbitrary accuracy. For instance,
electrons may be considered to be located somewhere within a region of space,
but with their exact positions being unknown. Contours of constant probability,
often referred to as “clouds” may be drawn around the nucleus of an atom to conceptualize where the electron
might be located with the most probability. Heisenberg's uncertainty principle quantifies the inability to precisely locate the particle given its conjugate. The other exemplar that led to quantum mechanics was the study of
electromagnetic waves such as light. When it was found in 1900 by Max Planck
that the energy of waves could be described as consisting of small packets or quanta, Albert Einstein exploited this idea to show that an electromagnetic wave such
as light could be described by a particle called the photon with a discrete energy dependent on its frequency. This led to a theory of
unity between subatomic particles and electromagnetic waves called wave–particle duality in which particles and waves were neither one nor the other, but had certain
properties of both. While quantum mechanics describes the world of the very
small, it also is needed to explain certain “macroscopic quantum systems” such as superconductors and superfluids. Broadly speaking, quantum mechanics incorporates four classes of phenomena that
classical physics cannot account for:
the quantization (discretization) of certain physical quantities, wave-particle duality, the uncertainty principle, and quantum entanglement.
Each of these phenomena is described in detail in subsequent sections.[10]
3.0 YouTube Videos
3.1 Video ClipsThe popular video hosting site, YouTube, carries several videos on or about Quantum Mechanics ...
Quantum Mechanics  Javascript must be enabled!
Required at least Flash 8 ... | PAUSE RESUMETo play video, click on title in menu below. |
Tags: Quantum Mechanics Electrons Particle Waves Einstein Heisenberg's
Uncertainty Principle
dr quantum Physics science facts experiment particle atoms atomic
waves photon connection
quantum mechanics particle physics electron debroglie wave fermilab 3.1.1 Video SummariesHere are the YouTube video summaries:
Title: Quantum Mechanics for Dummies - Electrons Are Weird
From: thingsihaveseen2
Added: September 17, 2007
Info-Description: Clips from a BBC documentary explaining the arguments from the 1920's
until now as to whether electrons are particles, waves or both.
It outlines Einstein's distaste at Heisenberg's uncertainty principle and is a
good starting point in realising that the universe is far, far stranger than
can be imagined.
Formerly on thingsihaveseen
Title: Amazing Facts of Quantum Physics
From: phippi46
Added: June 15, 2007
Info-Description: Yet another great mystery of Quantum Physics .. truly amazing
Title: Quantum Mechanics: The Double Slit Experiment
From: noonscience
Added: November 18, 2007
Info-Description: Fermilab physicist, Dr. Robert Plunkett, describes the deBroglie wave
nature of an electron as demonstrated in the infamous double slit experiment.
3.2 Additional Video ClipsHere are more video clips about Quantum Mechanics and related stuff ...
Quantum Mechanics Javascript must be enabled!
Required at least Flash 8 ... | PAUSE RESUMETo play video, click on title in menu below. |
Tags: robert anton wilson raw explains quantum physics mechanics reality
tunnel belief system model map dedroidify
physics quantum mechanics tunneling fusion potential energy star
reality uncertainty measurement
quantum mechanics particle physics double slit experiment fermilab 3.2.1 Video SummariesHere are the YouTube video summaries for the above additonal video clips:
Title: Robert Anton Wilson explains Quantum Physics
From: sloeber
Added: December 28, 2007
Info-Description: http://www.dedroidify.com
http://www.dedroidify.com/vids
http://www.dedroidify.com/realitytunnel
Any model we make does not describe the universe it describes what our brains
are capable of saying at this time. All perception is gamble. We believe what
we see and then we believe our interpretation of it we dont even know we're
making an interpretation most of the time.
Translator: "She wants to know what Quantum Physics is..." *takes sip*
RAW: "WHAT?"
Translator: "Quantum Phsyics, explain it simply she asks"
RAW: "Explain Quantum Physics simply..."
Translater braces herself LOL but she has nothing to worry about because RAW
explains it wonderfully
thanks to picturethefastlight
http://www.youtube.com/picturethefastlight
http://www.dedroidify.com
http://www.dedroidify.com/vids
http://www.dedroidify.com/realitytunnel
Title: What is quantum tunneling?
From: dcolarusso
Added: March 25, 2007
Info-Description: Transcript: http://www.davidcolarusso.com/blog/?p=33#more-33
This video is an adaptation of an earlier piece of mine--Perspective on quantum
mechanical tunneling.
That film, however, was designed for a unique audience, and I felt its overall
length was limiting its appeal here. So I've repackaged it as one of my weekly
postings. I Hope you enjoy.
People have been asking for the math. So here it is. The Sun's core temp is
~13.6 MK. For hydrogen nuclei the Coulomb barrier is roughly 0.1 MeV. This
corresponds to a temperature in excess of 1 GK!
Luckily, tunneling and the distribution of speeds among nuclei lower the actual
temperature required. So without tunneling even the Sun's core isn't hot enough
for fusion. To see most of this worked through, check out this link:
http://burro.cwru.edu/Academics/Astr221/StarPhys/coulomb.html
for a less mathematical explanation, try:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_fusion#Requirements
Transcript: http://www.davidcolarusso.com/edblog/...
The Tabletop Explainer is an intermittent educational vlog presenting answers
to viewer questions, brief science lessons, and ideas for teachers and
students. It is a feature of my blog "Tilts at Windmils" which can be found at
http://www.davidcolarusso.com/blog/
Title: Quantum Mechanics: Dual Nature of Matter
From: noonscience
Added: October 07, 2007
Info-Description: Dr. Roger Dixon from the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory explains
how particle physicists must take into consideration the dual nature of
particles to conduct their experiments.
4.0 EpilogThis web article comprises some introductory notes and YouTube video clips, on Quantum Mechanics ... Cheers!
Webmeister
Woodlands, Singapore| Incept Date: | | 31 May 2009 | | Rev'd Date: | | 21 July 2009 |
 |  |  |  | This website is predicated on the basis of the following categorization of the
Sciences ... Four Categories of Science By Stanton T. Friedman (Former Nuclear Physicist)Some people have insisted that if I can't provide a piece of a [flying] saucer
or an alien body, there is nothing to support my claims. I was quite surprised
during my last visit with Carl Sagan in December 1992, when he claimed that the
essence of the scientific method was reproducibility. In actuality, as I wrote
Sagan later on, there are at least four different kinds of science: - [Category-1 Science] Yes, there is a lot of excellent science done by people who set up
an experiment in which they can control all the variables and equipment. They
make measurements and then publish their results, after peer review, and
describe their equipment, instruments, and activity in detail so that others
can duplicate the work and, presumably, come to the same conclusions. Such
science can be very satisfying, and certainly can contribute to the advancement
of knowledge. However, it is not the only kind of science.
- [Category-2 Science] A second kind of science involves situations in which one cannot
control all the variables, but can predict some. For example, I cannot prove
that on occasion the moon comes directly between the sun and the Earth and
casts a shadow of darkness on the Earth, because I cannot control the positions
of the Earth, moon, or sun. What can be done is predicting the times when such
eclipses will happen and being ready to make observations when they occur.
Hopefully the weather where I have my instruments will allow me to make lots of
measurements.
- [Category-3 Science] A third kind of science involves events that can neither be
predicted nor controlled, but one can be ready to make measurements if
something does happen. For example, an array of seismographs can be established
to allow measurements to be made at several locations in the event of an
earthquake. When I was at the University of Chicago, a block of nuclear
emulsion was attached to a large balloon that would be released when a
radiation detector indicated that a solar storm had occurred (something we
could neither produce nor predict). Somebody would rush to Stagg Field and
release the balloon. When the balloon was
retrieved, the emulsion would be carefully examined to measure the number,
direction, velocity, and mass characteristics of particles unleashed by the sun.
- [Category-4 Science] Finally, there is a fourth kind of science, still using the rules
to attack difficult problems. These are the events that involve intelligence,
such as airplane crashes, murders, rapes, and automobile accidents. We do not
know when or where they will occur, but we do know they will. In a typical year
more than 40,000 Americans will be killed in automobile accidents. We don't
know where or when, so rarely are TV cameras whirling when these events take
place. But we can, after the fact, collect and evaluate evidence. We can
determine if the driver had high levels of alcohol in his or her blood, whether
the brakes failed, whether the visibility was poor, where a skid started, and
so on. Observations of strange phenomena in the sky come under this last
category.
In all the category-4 events, we must obtain as much testimony from witnesses
as possible. Some testimony is worth more than other testimony, perhaps because
of the duration of observation, the nearness of the witnesses to the event, the
specialized training of the observer, the availability of corroborative
evidence such as videos and still photos, or the consistency of evidence when
there is testimony from more than one witness. Our entire legal system is based
on testimony — rarely is there conclusive proof such as DNA
matching. Judges and juries must decide, with appropriate cross-examination,
who is telling the truth. In some states, testimony from one witness can lead
to the death penalty
for the accused. We should take note of the fact that even instrument data is dependent on
testimony from the observer of the instruments, and on appropriate calibration
and validation under standardized circumstances. Also, our courts place limits
on requirements for testimony, such as that against one spouse by the other.
Furthermore, there are rules about hearsay testimony, and rules regarding legal
evidence are complex and detailed. When it comes to flying saucers, we must remember that the reason most
sightings can be determined to be relatively conventional phenomena, often seen
under unusual circumstances, is that most people are relatively good observers.
The problem comes with the interpretation of what was observed. People watching
the sky late at night may get excited about a very bright light that moved very
slowly. Checking on the position of the planets at that time may reveal that
that light was Venus, because we have good information as to the angle of
observation, the direction of the light from the observer, the relatively slow
rate of motion, the location of Venus at that time, and so on. On three
occasions, when living in Southern California, I was called by people who
described an unusual object moving rapidly. I tried to make sure that I
analyzed their observations, such as, what time was it? In what direction were
you looking? In what direction did it seem to be moving? Was there any sound?
What was its apparent size, say, as compared to the moon (just covered by an
aspirin held at arm's length)? Two of the people wanted to tell me that the object was just over the next
hill. I stressed that this was an interpretation, because even huge objects far
away can seem to be small objects nearby. In all three cases, I felt that what
was being described sounded similar to a rocket launched down the California
Coast when the sun had gone down, but while the object was high enough to still
be in sunlight. I had seen such a spectacular case once myself. I checked, in
all three cases, with Vandenberg Air Force Base, which launches many rockets
down the U.S. West Coast. Indeed, there had been a launch at the right time in
each case. One case was especially intriguing, because several witnesses were
looking out across the ocean from a beach area and described the thing they saw
as similar to a string of popcorn. It turned out to be the launch of a special
weather satellite with extra solid boosters being dropped off multiple times. The people were good observers. To say the least, it would be irrational to say
that people are good observers when their input allows us to identify the
object being observed, and yet poor observers if we can't identify the UFO as
something conventional. — Stanton T. Friedman (Nuclear Physicist)
Flying Saucers and Science
Subtitle — A Scientist Investigates the Mysteries of UFOs: Interstellar Travel, Crashes,
and Government Cover-Ups
(Chapter 1 - "The Case for the ET Origin of Flying Saucers")
(Franklin Lakes, NJ: New Page Books, 2008)   |  |  |  |  |
| | | | Nine Points to Note - Recently, we added a simple blog so that you would be apprised of the latest
changes to the Mysteries of the World Website. To get the updates automatically, CLICK HERE to subscribe to our RSS (you will get a new window or 'tab'). Thanks and cheers!
Warning to the unthinking (and to the control freaks and power junkies) ... You probably won't like the following 'thinking' observation ... But it's
an important part of any exploration, investigation, study, etc. of the Mysteries of the World ... SEVEN DOORS TO SEVEN ROOMS OF THOUGHT- Accept the statement of Eminent Authority without basis, without question.
- Disagree with the statement without basis, out of general contrariness.
- Perhaps the statement is true, but what if it isn't? How then to account for
the phenomenon?
- How much of the statement rationalizes to suit man's purpose that he and his
shall be ascendant at the centre of things?
- What if the minor should become major, the recessive dominant, the obscure
prevalent?
- What if the statement were reversible, that which is considered effect is
really cause?
- What if the natural law perceived in one field also operates unperceived in all
other phases of science? What if there be only one natural law manifesting
itself, as yet, to us in many facets because we cannot apperceive the whole, of
which we have gained only the most elementary glimpses, with which we can cope
only at the crudest level?
And are those still other doors, yet undefined, on down the corridor? |
- Please do not assume or conclude that, just because I present many views (in
the form of textual notes, pictures/stills, and audio and video
clips) — as well as many advertisements, some by me and some
automatically by Google Adsense and Amazon — on this website,
it does not
mean that I am in agreement with or that I believe in the views and/or ads
offered-proferred ... That would be displaying such a parochial and provincial
attitude, towards this website and towards me as well!
As an ex-military officer, I assure you that I am in the habit of reading,
viewing and digesting lots of stuff that I don't necessarily believe in ... We
call all the stuff we read, view and digest, 'military intelligence' ... The
same applies with 'business intelligence' in the business world, of course. Our aim, as usual, is to find out what others (including our friends, enemies,
competitors, suppliers, strategic partners, business partners, etc.) believe
in. In order to do that effectively, we have to 'get out of the way', so to
speak — we have to remove our humongous
ego! — else we will never ever really have gotten started in
our journey of exploration and discovery of the Mysteries of the World. Furthermore, similarly and additionally, as a "Charismatic Christian", there
are lots of stuff presented in this website that I do not believe in ... which
had even led some to label me as "Fundamentalist"! ... Whatever! Matthew 7 1Judge not, that ye be not judged.2For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye
mete, it shall be measured to you again. 3And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest
not the beam that is in thine own eye? 4Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye;
and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye? 5Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt
thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye. — Jesus the Christ
(Yahoshua ha Mashiach;
Yeshua/Yesua; Ieosus; Joshua),
"Sermon on the Mount"
If you want to hear the NIV — specifically, from The Visual Bible: Matthew (1993) — please click the audio player below:
In short, in this website, I present many things that, I am hopeful, would be
of interest to a student, explorer and investigator of the Mysteries of the World ... but this doesn't mean that I believe in any of the stuff presented. ... Got it? ... Right! - Here is a purpose that I am wholeheartedly in agreement with ...
[Mysteries, Monsters, Mutants, Myths, Miracles & Much More ...]Our purpose ... is to describe the rich variety of anomalous, unexplained,
sometimes totally bizarre phenomena that people have experienced in all times
and places and that are still occurring today. ... the nature of the world and
of our existence are quite different from that which we were taught at school.
The reality is far more interesting, humorous and expansive than any religious
or rational, scientific world-view can possibly accommodate. It is not our intention here to dispute anyone's beliefs or
theories — but we should like to point out their limitations.
There are things that happen in this world - and have occurred throughout the
whole of human experience - for which there has never been a lasting
explanation. Explanations are temporary products, coming and going in response
to fashions. Meanwhile, the happenings they are supposed to explain carry on as
mysteriously as ever. — John Michell and Bob Rickard
The Rough Guide to Unexplained Phenomena (Rough Guide Reference)
(New York, NY: Rough Guides Ltd, 2007) - Here is a sentiment that I am wholeheartedly in agreement with ...
As I sit down to redo this book for an American audience, what rises before me
is last night's dream: I'm in a broad and beautiful land among many trees. It's
night. I look up at a huge old tree that's dark against the starry sky in its
detail of twig and branch. There is room enough here for all of us, I realize,
here in this big, intricately textured park. But I see that some want to cut
down the trees and level it out, so huge throngs of people can gather to gaze
up at the sun's glare. I watch dark twigs fingering the remote, untouchable
stars. A voice speaks: "Don't turn this into a Copernican Garden." Waking up, I remember that I went to sleep wondering how to put this book
together. And I take "Copernican Garden" to mean a parking lot vista where
masses gather to honor the bright sun of traditional science with its old rules
as the center of the universe. So I will not cut down the trees and level this book out. It is between you and
me [or you and I], a conversation as we stroll along in a moonlit fractal
garden past webby connections of thought that merge to patterned insight. Here
hidden delights nestle in scaling patterns of self-similar but never quite
repeating beauty. Here the tree of life hold stars in its branches. No matter
how huge, this garden stays human-sized because we have a place in it, you and
I. No need to cut down the connective forest and level things out for that
bright Sol [sun] of left-brain logic whose daytime dazzle — so
close and glaring — can blind us to the myriad constellations
beyond. [...] — Katya Walter, Tao of Chaos
Sub-title: Merging East and West
(1994, 1996) - Here is an observation (adapted) made in the Acknowledgement page of a book ...
It takes many minds to produce a book [including an e-book, of course].
Although most authors [especially of non-fiction books and articles] would
prefer not to admit this fact, fundamentally they are merely 'synthesisers' of
accumulated knowledge. The process of synthesising may unveil a new reality map, or paradigm, which,
in due course, will be used by future pioneers to unveil further paradigms. This principle was summed up by Sir Isaac Newton when he remarked: "If I have
seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants". [...] — Christian von Nidda, Our Secret Planet
(2005) - Here is an observation about UFO-Aliens cover-up or conspiracy that may be of
general interest, although some readers would not agree with the observation
(e.g., they may say that some whistleblowers, such as Bob Lazar on the
Roswell-type flying saucers in secret Area-51 labs, have already come forward)
...
If any long-term coherent cover up of UFO information does exist, however, then
it must operate at all levels of government and the media. It must encompass
all the relevant written materials, from the briefest handwritten note in
government files to entries in squadron log books to letters in the personal
papers of members of the Establishment. Hundreds of politicians, service
personnel, police officers, clerks and officials, over half a century, would be
required to excise any reference to the reality of UFOs from official documents
and the media. The number of people who would have taken part in this cover up
would be vast, yet not one person has broken ranks to 'blow the whistle' on the
greatest story ever told. Meantime, millions of dollars are being spent every
day on space probes and radio telescopes that are searching for evidence of
alien life. Would there be any reason for a conspiracy of silence if that
evidence already existed? — Dr David Clarke and Andy Roberts, Out of the Shadows
(2002) - Even though I am a "Charismatic Christian", the views presented herewith, in
this Mysteries of the World Website, will NOT be colored by this fact of being a Charismatic Christian. Rather, where and
when I find it necessary (and usually, I would NOT find it necessary, since I find it tiresome to repeat myself, again and again
and again ..., ad infinitum ..., but if I should find it necessary to repeat myself), I will then state
what my Charismatic Christian beliefs lead me to believe
in — even though I am aware that my own Charismatic Christian
beliefs may or may not be the same as, or in accord with, those beliefs of
others who also may want to regard themselves as Charismatic Christians
(nb/note well: there appears to be so many varieties of Charismatic Christian
beliefs, including from those who are simultaneously of the
traditional-historical denominations — such as the Roman
Catholics, with their purgatories, mortal and venial sins, and their Mother
this and Mother that. Shudder! Shudder! Shudder!).
Thus, for example, I do not necessarily "believe" in "ghosts", even as I (will
later) examine the entire gamut of so-called "paranormal events or phenomena",
especially of those with a psychic bent (truly, these are bent!, as in
less-than-straight, aka "crooked", thinking variety). Many so-called "ghosts"
are probably some form of "fallen angels" or "demons" of the Biblical kind,
masquerading as either gods, demons, spirits, ghosts, or even "angels of light"
(when they are obviously "fallen" and are "angels of darkness", or "sons of
darkness" as used in one of the Dead Sea Scrolls, i.e. The War of the Sons of Light Against the Sons of Darkness). Anyway, the author of 1 John, gave us a simple test against any "spirit" to see
whether that spirit is of light (God; Christ/Son of God; Holy Spirit of
God/Comforter/Advocate/Paraclete/The One; Jehovah/Yahveh/Yahweh/God the Father)
or of darkness (Satan, Lucifer, the Devil; the Anti-Christ; the False Prophet;
the Beast): 2This is how you can recognize the Spirit of God: Every spirit that acknowledges
that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, 3but every spirit that does not acknowledge Jesus is not from God. This is the
spirit of the antichrist, which you have heard is coming and even now is
already in the world. — First Epistle of John
(1 John 4:2-3; New
International Version/NIV)
(Note: many Catholics like NIV
and dislike KJV! Tough!) Whatever the case may be about "ghosts" and other "apparitions", in this
website, I have stated that we will be truth-based and science-based. Despite
this, definitely, I will not be ashamed of being a Charismatic Christian or of
God's Word:If anyone is ashamed of me and my words, the Son of Man will be ashamed of him
when he comes in his glory and in the glory of the Father and of the holy
angels. (Spoken by Jesus and recorded in Luke 9:26; NIV)If anyone is ashamed of me and my words in this adulterous and sinful
generation, the Son of Man will be ashamed of him when he comes in his Father's
glory with the holy angels. (Spoken by Jesus and recorded in Mark 8:38; NIV) I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power of God for the
salvation of everyone who believes: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile. (Apostle Paul, in his Epistle to the Romans; Romans 1:16; NIV)
| | | | |
Check our Mysteries Blog to see the latest changes to our webpages and 'web articles' (click on the Mysteries Blog button on the LEFT NavBar)
As stated in our Mysteries Blog, the ' Mysteries of the World' Website does NOT aim to sensationalize any particular 'Mystery', although we
will examine and explore all possible viewpoints pertaining to each
'Mystery' — including the fringe AND the mainstream. We will, of course, come to a conclusion ( eventually!) about each 'Mystery' ... even if that conclusion may eventually turn out to
be 'as yet unresolved' or 'unexplained to our satisfaction'.
|
Go to TOP of this page ['Quantum Mechanics' - Tier 3] Return back ['Articles' - Tier 2] Return to Homepage ['Mysteries of the World' - Tier 1]
| |
or 
) ...
