| | |
| | Russian Roswell From: "Middle-Weights"Interesting ("Quixotic") Topics in-between Short-Shorts & Long-Shots | |
| |
Taglines: | Let the exploration continue to expand ...!!! Did the Russians also have a Roswell-type Incident where
a UFO crash-landed and alien autopsies were conducted? |
by Paul Quek, from Singapore BBA (Hons), MAppSci (CompSci) [Bachelor of Business Administration, Honours]
[Master of Applied Science, Computing Science] Check this out: Cool Software! (New window opens)
| Incept Date: | | 01 July 2009 | | Rev'd Date: | | 18 November 2009 |
"Russian Roswell | Amazing UFO Crash Site Video"
Uploaded to Google VideosDate of Upload: Dec 15, 2006 Description: A UFO crash site allegedly filmed by the Russian KGB in March of 1969 in
the Sverdlovsk region of Russia. The footage was later obtained by documentary
filmmakers who then published the movie, "The Secret KGB UFO Files" A film
expert noted in the documentary that the film came in an old Soviet film can
and the numbers on the films header matched the cans they came in. The header
of the film has the crest of the KGB on it and the term for TOP SECRET. An
autopsy of the alleged pilot of the UFO is seen in the documentary film. Soviet
doctors examine the burned torso of the entity and it is revealed that the
three doctors died one week later all from cerebral hemorrhages. Death
certificates are presented as proof. Several KGB documents are produced to
prove the film is authentic. Some have put forth the argument that an American
Production crew filmed the footage in March 1998. These claims are put forth on
web sites claiming to know the truth about this footage. To date they have
failed to show even one current photo of any of the soldiers in the film nor
any statements from the actors that they were indeed only actors in this film.
This should be easy to obtain if the footage was recently filmed. Another
theory suggests the film was a training exercise. Yet no one has produced
witnesses verifying this claim. There is mounting evidence of a very serious
extraterrestrial reality now facing mankind. Visit AlienVideo.net to stay
updated on the latest news & video footage from alien activity around the
world.
 |  |  |  |
UFO FILES
Russian Roswell
UFO FILES
Russian RoswellThe History Channel (March 2006)Adapted from: www.ufodata.co.uk/pdf/THE_UFO_FILES_Russian_Roswell.pdfAlso available at: www.scribd.com/doc/18049525/The-Ufo-Files-Russian-Roswell
The History Channel’s UFO Files continues with its theme of worldwide ‘Roswells’, after bringing us Britain’s Roswell, Mexico’s Roswell and Texas’ Roswell. This latest episode tells us all about the Russian Roswell. Kapustin Yar was the former Soviet Union’s most sensitive air base, even
exceeding America’s Area 51 for the levels of secrecy that shrouded it. ... Kapustin Yar was created as the site for the development of the Soviet Union’s
space program after the end of World War II. It lies over 500 miles south of
Moscow and about 60 miles east of Volgograd, the former Stalingrad. These days
it lies close to the Kazakhstan border, but back in those days, the base was
deep inside Soviet territory. It was here that captured V2 rockets and the
German scientists that created them were set to work with not only the single
task of getting into space before the Americans, but also designing and testing
new aircraft, missiles and other weapons systems. The base was deemed so secret
that the nearby town of Zhitkur was emptied of its population and levelled
because it was too close. In 1948, less than a year after the famed Roswell Incident, the base’s radar operators picked up an unidentified object. At the same
time, a fighter pilot flying close to the base had a visual sighting of a
silver, cigar-shaped object. Reporting that he was being blinded by rays from
the UFO, the pilot was ordered to engage with it and, after a three minute
dogfight, a missile successfully brought down the object. It seems that the UFO
fired some sort of energy weapon at the MiG and both craft crashed to the
ground. William J Birnes, publisher of the American UFO Magazine, believed that the alien craft fired a particle beam weapon at the Soviet
fighter, but a lucky shot with the missile disrupted the UFO’s anti-gravity
field, causing it to fall from the sky. Soviet recovery teams quickly gathered
up all the wreckage and transported it to the underground facility at Kapustin
Yar, which was ironically named Zhitkur, after the former town not far from the
base. Birnes claimed that MiG pilots were ordered to take any measures necessary to
bring down extraterrestrial craft because Moscow was desperate to gain any
advantage over the United States, whom they believed had made their tremendous advances due to recovered flying saucer reverse-engineering. [...] The Tunguska EventOn June 30th, 1908, a huge fireball raced across the Siberian taiga and
exploded over the forest close to the town of Tunguska. Six hundred square
miles of tundra was razed to the ground and the shockwave was felt by
seismographs around the world. At first it was thought that a meteor had impacted with the Earth and when the
first expeditions arrived twenty years later, they expected to find a huge
crater. No crater was found, but the devastation was evident, with trees laid
out like matchsticks in a huge, circular swathe from the centre of the blast.
From the pattern of the destruction, it soon became apparent that the object
had exploded high above the ground, much like the atomic bombs dropped on Japan
in 1945, but much more powerful in terms of magnitude. Most researchers outside of Russia, including Stanton Friedman, were convinced
that this was a natural event and nothing to do with aliens or UFOs, but
Russian ufologists, such as Nikolai Subbotin of the Russian UFO Research
Station, were not so sure. Subbotin explained how the object apparently changed
course twice before exploding, something a natural object such as a meteorite
or comet cannot do. Then there were unexplained radiation levels in the region
and the fact that plant life appears to have been altered because of this
radiation. Stalin himself seemed convinced that the event was related to some sort of
weapon, possibly from extraterrestrials, and he set Sergei Korolev, the father
of Soviet rocketry, the task of finding answers. Korolev financed a team to
travel to Tunguska in fleets of helicopters. They found radioactive metal
fragments and an area that has become known as ‘The Devil’s Graveyard’, an area
close to the blast site where no plants will grow and animals tend to die.
Although Korolev is believed to have told Stalin that he thought the blast was caused by an alien spacecraft, his official report put the blame squarely on a
meteorite. American Intelligence AgenciesAs rumours began to filter back to Washington DC about UFO wreckage from
Tunguska, the 1948 crash and other incidents being taken to Zhitkur, it became
obvious to America’s intelligence agencies that they needed to find out what
was going on. Their spies informed them that the Soviet Union was building huge
rockets that could not only carry large, nuclear payloads, but could also reach
space. Indeed, their progress became so rapid, that the Soviets were ahead of
their own schedules in terms of advancement. By the time American U2 spy planes photographed the complex at Kapustin Yar,
there were at least four ballistic launch sites, fourteen launch pads, a
highly-sophisticated radar tracking facility, three long runways and numerous
unidentified areas. There were strange, geometric patterns on the ground. Many
UFO researchers believe that these designs are to attract UFOs and are
patterned after ancient monuments and cereal glyphs. <<< What the reconnaissance aircraft could not reveal was the underground Zhitkur
facility. UFO Files now took us on a virtual guided tour of the base, recreated from descriptions
given from Russian ufologist Anton Anfalov. A quarter of a mile beneath the
surface, we were led down dark, dank corridors and tunnels, with numerous
chambers containing various types of extraterrestrial craft in various stages
of disassembly. There were areas where autopsies of aliens would take place and
other sections where perhaps engines were being reconstructed. Finally, there
are huge hangars containing not aircraft, but large, cigar- or
cylindrical-shaped objects. <<< The advances at Kapustin enabled the Soviets to leap ahead of America in the
space race. In 1957, Sputnik I was successfully placed into orbit. A month
later, a dog called Laika became the first animal in space. In 1961, Yuri
Gagarin became the first man to orbit the Earth. In 1963, Valentina Tereshkova
became the first woman to travel into pace. In 1965, Alexei Leonov became the
first man to ‘walk’ in space. Russia’s cosmonauts also performed the first
rendezvous and docking in space. Apart from the Apollo moon shots, the Soviet
Union was winning the space race until the space shuttle was first launched in
1981. <<< One of Russia’s most well-known ufologists is Vladimir Azhazha (sometimes
spelled Ajaja). He took us on a tour of a site close to Kapustin Yar where he
claimed a UFO crashed. Dowsing with copper rods, he found an elliptical area
where he claimed that an alien craft had plummeted to Earth in 1961. He said
that animals avoided the area, no cattle will graze there and strange energies
affect your pulse rate and breathing. A local resident, Zoya Shubenkina, corroborated Azhazha’s story about the 1961
crash, claiming she had witnessed it for herself. She said a big, fiery, red
sphere flew over her house and crashed in the valley by the river. Azhazha explained how many Soviet fighter pilots engaged in dogfights with
UFOs. Former Soviet Air Force colonel and cosmonaut, a hero of the state,
Marina Popovich confirmed that she had personally witnessed aerial battles
between Soviet jets and UFOs. One such event she described occurred in 1964. During a training mission, two
jets came under attack from a UFO and were forced into a spiral dive. In 1980,
Colonel Popovich encountered several unidentified objects while on a top secret
mission. She said they were three fireball-like lights and she watched as they
moved away. In the evening of the 7th of August, 1967, Colonel Vyatkin Lev Mikhailovic
suddenly encountered an object that was projecting a beam of light downwards.
He tried to wrestle his MiG away from the beam, but the left wing touched it
and he struggled to regain control. The plane shook and his instruments went
haywire. As they flew away, his technician exclaimed that the wing was glowing
and after they landed, it continued to glow for a whole week afterwards. <<< As more and more reports came in from across the Soviet Union, the KGB clamped
down, opening up its own file on the phenomenon, known as The Blue File. The Blue File would become the most comprehensive and largest study of UFOs
ever commissioned anywhere in the world. It ran from the midsixties until the
fall of the Soviet Union. One of its latest reports was from 1990, when
witnesses close to Kapustin Yar described UFOs in the sky for over an hour. The new freedoms in Russia enabled the producers of UFO Files to obtain ‘top secret’ footage of a supposed UFOs at Kapustin Yar. On June
3rd, 1960, two alien craft allegedly crashed at Kapustin Yar, creating an
expanding fireball that caused explosions in the vicinity for over an hour.
Figures are seen running from the conflagration, smoke pouring from their
clothing. One drops to the ground and lies motionless. One of the UFOs was said
to have destroyed three rockets on their launch pads, while the other took out
a fuel depot. Once the flames had been doused, the remains of the craft were
sent to Zhitkur. To be honest, to suggest that what was shown in the footage was a UFO is
stretching credulity somewhat. All we saw was a big fire. It could have been
anything, but the story persists and Stanton Friedman said that he had heard
those same rumours about UFOs destroying Soviet rockets in an act of
retaliation. <<< Russia is a land of many mysteries, not just ufological in nature. The
programme ended with a report from a US journalist, Kim Murphy of the LA Times, talking about her trip to Russia to investigate a lake that had mysteriously
vanished. She wasn’t sure she believed the stories, but when she got there, she
found that it was true. An entire lake had vanished, with eyewitnesses saying
that a huge whirlpool had formed and the water had vanished like water down a
plug hole. What that has to do with UFOs, I don’t know…
Getting back on track, we were told that research is still ongoing at Kapustin
Yar, with UFO wreckage being brought to Zhitkur quite regularly and as recently
as 1997, when a craft was said to have come down in Poland.
<<< Russian Roswell was another interesting look at the UFO phenomenon. The Soviet Union obviously
had a great deal of interest in the subject and, it seems, was prepared to act
in an extremely hostile manner towards unidentified craft in their airspace.
Was Moscow’s leap into space aided by reverse-engineering alien craft? The
evidence would suggest not. Soviet rockets were powered pretty much the same
way as American ones i.e. they didn’t get up there by using antigravity engines
from a crashed saucer. Still, it makes you wonder what secrets might lay in all
these underground facilities, not just in Russia, but all over the world.
|  |  |  |  |
Cheers! Paul Quek
Webmeister
Woodlands, Singapore| Incept Date: | | 01 July 2009 | | Rev'd Date: | | 18 November 2009 |
| | | | This website is predicated on the basis of the following categorization of the
Sciences ... Four Categories of Science By Stanton T. Friedman (Former Nuclear Physicist)Some people have insisted that if I can't provide a piece of a [flying] saucer
or an alien body, there is nothing to support my claims. I was quite surprised
during my last visit with Carl Sagan in December 1992, when he claimed that the
essence of the scientific method was reproducibility. In actuality, as I wrote
Sagan later on, there are at least four different kinds of science: - [Category-1 Science] Yes, there is a lot of excellent science done by people who set up
an experiment in which they can control all the variables and equipment. They
make measurements and then publish their results, after peer review, and
describe their equipment, instruments, and activity in detail so that others
can duplicate the work and, presumably, come to the same conclusions. Such
science can be very satisfying, and certainly can contribute to the advancement
of knowledge. However, it is not the only kind of science.
- [Category-2 Science] A second kind of science involves situations in which one cannot
control all the variables, but can predict some. For example, I cannot prove
that on occasion the moon comes directly between the sun and the Earth and
casts a shadow of darkness on the Earth, because I cannot control the positions
of the Earth, moon, or sun. What can be done is predicting the times when such
eclipses will happen and being ready to make observations when they occur.
Hopefully the weather where I have my instruments will allow me to make lots of
measurements.
- [Category-3 Science] A third kind of science involves events that can neither be
predicted nor controlled, but one can be ready to make measurements if
something does happen. For example, an array of seismographs can be established
to allow measurements to be made at several locations in the event of an
earthquake. When I was at the University of Chicago, a block of nuclear
emulsion was attached to a large balloon that would be released when a
radiation detector indicated that a solar storm had occurred (something we
could neither produce nor predict). Somebody would rush to Stagg Field and
release the balloon. When the balloon was
retrieved, the emulsion would be carefully examined to measure the number,
direction, velocity, and mass characteristics of particles unleashed by the sun.
- [Category-4 Science] Finally, there is a fourth kind of science, still using the rules
to attack difficult problems. These are the events that involve intelligence,
such as airplane crashes, murders, rapes, and automobile accidents. We do not
know when or where they will occur, but we do know they will. In a typical year
more than 40,000 Americans will be killed in automobile accidents. We don't
know where or when, so rarely are TV cameras whirling when these events take
place. But we can, after the fact, collect and evaluate evidence. We can
determine if the driver had high levels of alcohol in his or her blood, whether
the brakes failed, whether the visibility was poor, where a skid started, and
so on. Observations of strange phenomena in the sky come under this last
category.
In all the category-4 events, we must obtain as much testimony from witnesses
as possible. Some testimony is worth more than other testimony, perhaps because
of the duration of observation, the nearness of the witnesses to the event, the
specialized training of the observer, the availability of corroborative
evidence such as videos and still photos, or the consistency of evidence when
there is testimony from more than one witness. Our entire legal system is based
on testimony — rarely is there conclusive proof such as DNA
matching. Judges and juries must decide, with appropriate cross-examination,
who is telling the truth. In some states, testimony from one witness can lead
to the death penalty
for the accused. We should take note of the fact that even instrument data is dependent on
testimony from the observer of the instruments, and on appropriate calibration
and validation under standardized circumstances. Also, our courts place limits
on requirements for testimony, such as that against one spouse by the other.
Furthermore, there are rules about hearsay testimony, and rules regarding legal
evidence are complex and detailed. When it comes to flying saucers, we must remember that the reason most
sightings can be determined to be relatively conventional phenomena, often seen
under unusual circumstances, is that most people are relatively good observers.
The problem comes with the interpretation of what was observed. People watching
the sky late at night may get excited about a very bright light that moved very
slowly. Checking on the position of the planets at that time may reveal that
that light was Venus, because we have good information as to the angle of
observation, the direction of the light from the observer, the relatively slow
rate of motion, the location of Venus at that time, and so on. On three
occasions, when living in Southern California, I was called by people who
described an unusual object moving rapidly. I tried to make sure that I
analyzed their observations, such as, what time was it? In what direction were
you looking? In what direction did it seem to be moving? Was there any sound?
What was its apparent size, say, as compared to the moon (just covered by an
aspirin held at arm's length)? Two of the people wanted to tell me that the object was just over the next
hill. I stressed that this was an interpretation, because even huge objects far
away can seem to be small objects nearby. In all three cases, I felt that what
was being described sounded similar to a rocket launched down the California
Coast when the sun had gone down, but while the object was high enough to still
be in sunlight. I had seen such a spectacular case once myself. I checked, in
all three cases, with Vandenberg Air Force Base, which launches many rockets
down the U.S. West Coast. Indeed, there had been a launch at the right time in
each case. One case was especially intriguing, because several witnesses were
looking out across the ocean from a beach area and described the thing they saw
as similar to a string of popcorn. It turned out to be the launch of a special
weather satellite with extra solid boosters being dropped off multiple times. The people were good observers. To say the least, it would be irrational to say
that people are good observers when their input allows us to identify the
object being observed, and yet poor observers if we can't identify the UFO as
something conventional. — Stanton T. Friedman (Nuclear Physicist)
Flying Saucers and Science
Subtitle — A Scientist Investigates the Mysteries of UFOs: Interstellar Travel, Crashes,
and Government Cover-Ups
(Chapter 1 - "The Case for the ET Origin of Flying Saucers")
(Franklin Lakes, NJ: New Page Books, 2008)   | | | | |
| | | | Nine Points to Note - Recently, we added a simple blog so that you would be apprised of the latest
changes to the Mysteries of the World Website. To get the updates automatically, CLICK HERE to subscribe to our RSS (you will get a new window or 'tab'). Thanks and cheers!
Warning to the unthinking (and to the control freaks and power junkies) ... You probably won't like the following 'thinking' observation ... But it's
an important part of any exploration, investigation, study, etc. of the Mysteries of the World ... SEVEN DOORS TO SEVEN ROOMS OF THOUGHT- Accept the statement of Eminent Authority without basis, without question.
- Disagree with the statement without basis, out of general contrariness.
- Perhaps the statement is true, but what if it isn't? How then to account for
the phenomenon?
- How much of the statement rationalizes to suit man's purpose that he and his
shall be ascendant at the centre of things?
- What if the minor should become major, the recessive dominant, the obscure
prevalent?
- What if the statement were reversible, that which is considered effect is
really cause?
- What if the natural law perceived in one field also operates unperceived in all
other phases of science? What if there be only one natural law manifesting
itself, as yet, to us in many facets because we cannot apperceive the whole, of
which we have gained only the most elementary glimpses, with which we can cope
only at the crudest level?
And are those still other doors, yet undefined, on down the corridor? |
- Please do not assume or conclude that, just because I present many views (in
the form of textual notes, pictures/stills, and audio and video
clips) — as well as many advertisements, some by me and some
automatically by Google Adsense and Amazon — on this website,
it does not
mean that I am in agreement with or that I believe in the views and/or ads
offered-proferred ... That would be displaying such a parochial and provincial
attitude, towards this website and towards me as well!
As an ex-military officer, I assure you that I am in the habit of reading,
viewing and digesting lots of stuff that I don't necessarily believe in ... We
call all the stuff we read, view and digest, 'military intelligence' ... The
same applies with 'business intelligence' in the business world, of course. Our aim, as usual, is to find out what others (including our friends, enemies,
competitors, suppliers, strategic partners, business partners, etc.) believe
in. In order to do that effectively, we have to 'get out of the way', so to
speak — we have to remove our humongous
ego! — else we will never ever really have gotten started in
our journey of exploration and discovery of the Mysteries of the World. Furthermore, similarly and additionally, as a "Charismatic Christian", there
are lots of stuff presented in this website that I do not believe in ... which
had even led some to label me as "Fundamentalist"! ... Whatever! Matthew 7 1Judge not, that ye be not judged.2For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye
mete, it shall be measured to you again. 3And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest
not the beam that is in thine own eye? 4Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye;
and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye? 5Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt
thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye. — Jesus the Christ
(Yahoshua ha Mashiach;
Yeshua/Yesua; Ieosus; Joshua),
"Sermon on the Mount"
If you want to hear the NIV — specifically, from The Visual Bible: Matthew (1993) — please click the audio player below:
In short, in this website, I present many things that, I am hopeful, would be
of interest to a student, explorer and investigator of the Mysteries of the World ... but this doesn't mean that I believe in any of the stuff presented. ... Got it? ... Right! - Here is a purpose that I am wholeheartedly in agreement with ...
[Mysteries, Monsters, Mutants, Myths, Miracles & Much More ...]Our purpose ... is to describe the rich variety of anomalous, unexplained,
sometimes totally bizarre phenomena that people have experienced in all times
and places and that are still occurring today. ... the nature of the world and
of our existence are quite different from that which we were taught at school.
The reality is far more interesting, humorous and expansive than any religious
or rational, scientific world-view can possibly accommodate. It is not our intention here to dispute anyone's beliefs or
theories — but we should like to point out their limitations.
There are things that happen in this world - and have occurred throughout the
whole of human experience - for which there has never been a lasting
explanation. Explanations are temporary products, coming and going in response
to fashions. Meanwhile, the happenings they are supposed to explain carry on as
mysteriously as ever. — John Michell and Bob Rickard
The Rough Guide to Unexplained Phenomena (Rough Guide Reference)
(New York, NY: Rough Guides Ltd, 2007) - Here is a sentiment that I am wholeheartedly in agreement with ...
As I sit down to redo this book for an American audience, what rises before me
is last night's dream: I'm in a broad and beautiful land among many trees. It's
night. I look up at a huge old tree that's dark against the starry sky in its
detail of twig and branch. There is room enough here for all of us, I realize,
here in this big, intricately textured park. But I see that some want to cut
down the trees and level it out, so huge throngs of people can gather to gaze
up at the sun's glare. I watch dark twigs fingering the remote, untouchable
stars. A voice speaks: "Don't turn this into a Copernican Garden." Waking up, I remember that I went to sleep wondering how to put this book
together. And I take "Copernican Garden" to mean a parking lot vista where
masses gather to honor the bright sun of traditional science with its old rules
as the center of the universe. So I will not cut down the trees and level this book out. It is between you and
me [or you and I], a conversation as we stroll along in a moonlit fractal
garden past webby connections of thought that merge to patterned insight. Here
hidden delights nestle in scaling patterns of self-similar but never quite
repeating beauty. Here the tree of life hold stars in its branches. No matter
how huge, this garden stays human-sized because we have a place in it, you and
I. No need to cut down the connective forest and level things out for that
bright Sol [sun] of left-brain logic whose daytime dazzle — so
close and glaring — can blind us to the myriad constellations
beyond. [...] — Katya Walter, Tao of Chaos
Sub-title: Merging East and West
(1994, 1996) - Here is an observation (adapted) made in the Acknowledgement page of a book ...
It takes many minds to produce a book [including an e-book, of course].
Although most authors [especially of non-fiction books and articles] would
prefer not to admit this fact, fundamentally they are merely 'synthesisers' of
accumulated knowledge. The process of synthesising may unveil a new reality map, or paradigm, which,
in due course, will be used by future pioneers to unveil further paradigms. This principle was summed up by Sir Isaac Newton when he remarked: "If I have
seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants". [...] — Christian von Nidda, Our Secret Planet
(2005) - Here is an observation about UFO-Aliens cover-up or conspiracy that may be of
general interest, although some readers would not agree with the observation
(e.g., they may say that some whistleblowers, such as Bob Lazar on the
Roswell-type flying saucers in secret Area-51 labs, have already come forward)
...
If any long-term coherent cover up of UFO information does exist, however, then
it must operate at all levels of government and the media. It must encompass
all the relevant written materials, from the briefest handwritten note in
government files to entries in squadron log books to letters in the personal
papers of members of the Establishment. Hundreds of politicians, service
personnel, police officers, clerks and officials, over half a century, would be
required to excise any reference to the reality of UFOs from official documents
and the media. The number of people who would have taken part in this cover up
would be vast, yet not one person has broken ranks to 'blow the whistle' on the
greatest story ever told. Meantime, millions of dollars are being spent every
day on space probes and radio telescopes that are searching for evidence of
alien life. Would there be any reason for a conspiracy of silence if that
evidence already existed? — Dr David Clarke and Andy Roberts, Out of the Shadows
(2002) - Even though I am a "Charismatic Christian", the views presented herewith, in
this Mysteries of the World Website, will NOT be colored by this fact of being a Charismatic Christian. Rather, where and
when I find it necessary (and usually, I would NOT find it necessary, since I find it tiresome to repeat myself, again and again
and again ..., ad infinitum ..., but if I should find it necessary to repeat myself), I will then state
what my Charismatic Christian beliefs lead me to believe
in — even though I am aware that my own Charismatic Christian
beliefs may or may not be the same as, or in accord with, those beliefs of
others who also may want to regard themselves as Charismatic Christians
(nb/note well: there appears to be so many varieties of Charismatic Christian
beliefs, including from those who are simultaneously of the
traditional-historical denominations — such as the Roman
Catholics, with their purgatories, mortal and venial sins, and their Mother
this and Mother that. Shudder! Shudder! Shudder!).
Thus, for example, I do not necessarily "believe" in "ghosts", even as I (will
later) examine the entire gamut of so-called "paranormal events or phenomena",
especially of those with a psychic bent (truly, these are bent!, as in
less-than-straight, aka "crooked", thinking variety). Many so-called "ghosts"
are probably some form of "fallen angels" or "demons" of the Biblical kind,
masquerading as either gods, demons, spirits, ghosts, or even "angels of light"
(when they are obviously "fallen" and are "angels of darkness", or "sons of
darkness" as used in one of the Dead Sea Scrolls, i.e. The War of the Sons of Light Against the Sons of Darkness). Anyway, the author of 1 John, gave us a simple test against any "spirit" to see
whether that spirit is of light (God; Christ/Son of God; Holy Spirit of
God/Comforter/Advocate/Paraclete/The One; Jehovah/Yahveh/Yahweh/God the Father)
or of darkness (Satan, Lucifer, the Devil; the Anti-Christ; the False Prophet;
the Beast): 2This is how you can recognize the Spirit of God: Every spirit that acknowledges
that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, 3but every spirit that does not acknowledge Jesus is not from God. This is the
spirit of the antichrist, which you have heard is coming and even now is
already in the world. — First Epistle of John
(1 John 4:2-3; New
International Version/NIV)
(Note: many Catholics like NIV
and dislike KJV! Tough!) Whatever the case may be about "ghosts" and other "apparitions", in this
website, I have stated that we will be truth-based and science-based. Despite
this, definitely, I will not be ashamed of being a Charismatic Christian or of
God's Word:If anyone is ashamed of me and my words, the Son of Man will be ashamed of him
when he comes in his glory and in the glory of the Father and of the holy
angels. (Spoken by Jesus and recorded in Luke 9:26; NIV)If anyone is ashamed of me and my words in this adulterous and sinful
generation, the Son of Man will be ashamed of him when he comes in his Father's
glory with the holy angels. (Spoken by Jesus and recorded in Mark 8:38; NIV) I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power of God for the
salvation of everyone who believes: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile. (Apostle Paul, in his Epistle to the Romans; Romans 1:16; NIV)
| | | | |
Check our Mysteries Blog to see the latest changes to our webpages and 'web articles' (click on the Mysteries Blog button on the LEFT NavBar)
As stated in our Mysteries Blog, the ' Mysteries of the World' Website does NOT aim to sensationalize any particular 'Mystery', although we
will examine and explore all possible viewpoints pertaining to each
'Mystery' — including the fringe AND the mainstream. We will, of course, come to a conclusion ( eventually!) about each 'Mystery' ... even if that conclusion may eventually turn out to
be 'as yet unresolved' or 'unexplained to our satisfaction'.
|
|
or 
) ...
